Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[Manjushri]

Two things :

if "aura" is what Ra refers to as the etheric (in Law of One terms) why did they not call it an "etheric infringement?"

And you say homosexuality is bound to happen for whatever reason? But Ra says it is the "aura infringement" which causes the impairment to those who have lived as the opposite gender more often. It sounds like you are saying something else causes it and the "aura infringement" spreads gayness as an idea that vulnerable ones cling to.

Sometimes I call someone by a pronoun, sometimes I call them by their name. I think that the difference in this case is that the aura refers to a combination of the biolelectrical and etheric fields that center around an entity, versus ether, which is a more general term for time/space energy and the physical energy which interacts with it. Both are valid, but "aura" is more specialized.

I don't think he means infringement in the way that you mean infringement. He means, again, an undermining of the original blueprint and replacement by another. Human bodies evolved to be wired to be attracted to the opposite sex as a means of reproducing, and so, when something happens in the time/space dimension that imprints a new pattern of behavior over a previous one, it is "infringement". So if you spent a lot of incarnations as someone of the opposite gender, then you're karmically/etherically attached to all that and then incarnate into a body with different programming, you can reprogram what that body was wired to do via your time/space attachment.

Yes, I do think that homosexuality is bound to happen on its own; that makes logical sense.

I wouldn't choose your choice of words "idea" and "vulnerable", but that's the basic idea; I view it more as a potentiality floating around in the etheric DNA of a particular city or society or world that actualizes itself when the possibility/probability complexes allow it.

Thanks for clarifying. Semantics is important to me when trying to understand one's interpretation of Ra Material, especially when one claims that another's interpretation is "completely missing the point"

Your interpretation of gayness floating in the ether just possibly happening to an etheric body due to various things does not seem to leave much room for an entity to make the choice.

How do you envision the process of gayness entering one's aura with respect to one making the choice to allow it??