Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[Chandlersdad]

Well, I've just listened to the Youtube clip in question, and I have to concur with Chandlersdad, he is definitely condescending towards homosexuals. Then he confidently proclaims they don't have the need to make a family... wha?? Says who? So according to him a gay couple isn't a family, kids or no kids, it's irrelevant. Then he says a gay man thinks "I'm a girl" and a lesbian woman thinks "I'm a guy"! I have yet to meet a gay man who thinks of himself as a girl or a gay woman thinks of herself as a guy, quite the contrary, they are very happy with their own gender. They just happen to be attracted to their own gender. He's confusing transgenderism with homosexuality.

Then he goes on to say "according to Ra, this is by no means a moral or punishable sin"... as if anything according to Ra is a moral or punishable sin. There is no such thing as "punishable sin" in the material. There is no right or wrong.

Then he says "there are many angry gay people in the world, who identify with being gay, which is shallow"... saying "I'm not proud to be white..." ~chuckle-chuckle~ With such smugness... He carries on to say they are very angry, and have deep pain and self-hatred... and says "do you really like yourself? Do you really like yourself? Are you really well?"

Then he says "sooory, that's just what Ra says..."

I switched it off, I've heard enough.

Just to touch on the family thing, I know two gay couples who are awesome parents to their kids. In fact, they did a study a while back to see how kids raised by gay couples compare against their peers, and interestingly enough they do better than their peers.

Children Of Gay Parents Are Happier And Healthier Than Their Peers, New Study Finds

Children of lesbian parents do better than their peers

interesting, that might explain why he reincarnated. If you take a look at the life of George Hunt Williamson, not only do they look alike, but George's life was spent gathering different channelings and comparing which parts of the data matched, and through that was able to find a single unified story.






In his previous life he was very much a stickler for non distortion. That might be out of an earnest desire to promulgate the Law of One efficiently. In my years spent here in the forums, I felt a fundamental disconnect with strictly discussing the Law of One. Which is why I hardly ever go to strictly Law of One to post or comment. I feel personally that unity can only be learned by branching out seeing how other things match with Law of One as the foundation. It's not like the Law of One has a picture of this to show you.








With that said there is plenty of information that fills in intentional gaps Ra left out that reinforces and validates the Law of One to begin with. If anyone ever had doubts of a third eye, guess what everyone has one physically as well as energetically with the indigo ray. In my own personal opinion, trying to learn the Law of One and learn unity, strictly via the Law of One without other stuff to reinforce that learning, is what is in my opinion lacking in wisdom. I don't have any opinion of Scott, but it's been an interesting window into his actions. It's interesting to note that that he would be generally on the STO side of things, and there are plenty of people in the world actively working towards service to self, who need our discerning eyes to be... exposed. 


Like the bliss out side of the spiritual crowd, that refuses to face their shadow self.

Very interesting information. I do appreciate it. I don't subscribe to the idea that we have the same face incarnation after incarnation. If so, I am going to be one of the world's ugliest women in my next female incarnation. Seriously, we supposedly change race (each having its own genetic facial qualities) and I think having the same face would be very counter-productive. I do not believe this is true. For the record, I do NOT think David Wilcock is Edgar Cayce, just because he looked like Cayce in ONE photo. I also do not automatically think Scott was this other man. To me it would take a type of vanity and ego to shop around for a set of parents and then somehow ensure that the exact right sperm impregnated the exact right egg simply to ensure you have the same face as your previous incarnation. That just seems like such a petty thing to do. Nonetheless, here is a photo of me in my last female life. Then there is a photo of me now. I admit the resemblance is striking! So I may be wrong.