Session 31 - As a Gay Man, I think Ra's take on Homosexuality is idiotic

[Jade]

Hi Chandlersdad,

Firstly, I want to say, I'm sorry that Scott's interpretation has upset you so much. To be honest, I've only listened to a little bit of his videos, but they infuriated me too so I haven't since.

Ra's comments on homosexuality are... less than sensitive. But it must be taken in context with everything else Ra calls a "distortion" and a "confusion". I think Ra likes to stress the point of sexual polarity - and also, noting, that sexual function at its core is about reproduction.

Ra doesn't mention rats in a cage, or prison, or anything like that - these are Scott's interpretations. Scott seems to have an even less sensitive view than Ra. Here's what Ra says:

31.7 Questioner: Thank you. In the material earlier you mentioned “magnetic attraction.” Could you define and expand upon that term?

Ra: I am Ra. We used the term to indicate that in your bisexual natures there is that which is of polarity. This polarity may be seen to be variable according to the, shall we say, male/female polarization of each entity, be each entity biologically male or female. Thus you may see the magnetism when two entities with the appropriate balance, male/female versus female/male polarity, meeting and thus feeling the attraction which polarized forces will exert, one upon the other.

This is the strength of the bisexual mechanism. It does not take an act of will to decide to feel attraction for one who is oppositely polarized sexually. It will occur in an inevitable sense giving the free flow of energy a proper, shall we say, avenue. This avenue may be blocked by some distortion towards a belief/condition which states to the entity that this attraction is not desired. However, the basic mechanism functions as simply as would, shall we say, the magnet and the iron.

Ra says that it is the polarity of the male/female that has a natural attraction, that does not require an act of will. It's like a magnet. In theory, sex, at its core, is about reproduction. There is a red-ray energy exchange between and male and female entity that -could- randomly result in creating another life. Two males and two females do not experience this part of the transfer. It's just matter-of-fact about the nature of polarized sexual relations.

31.8 Questioner: We have what seems to be an increasing number of entities incarnate here now who have what is called a homosexual orientation in this respect. Could you explain and expand upon that concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Entities of this condition experience a great deal of distortion due to the fact that they have experienced many incarnations as biological male and as biological female. This would not suggest what you call homosexuality in an active phase were it not for the difficult vibratory condition of your planetary sphere. There is what you may call great aura infringement among your crowded urban areas in your more populous countries, as you call portions of your planetary surface. Under these conditions the confusions will occur.

This quote is a bit insensitive. But let us look at Don's question. "We have what seems to be an increasing number of entities..." I think what Ra is trying to say is that, in most conditions, when one incarnates as a female body they want a female experience, and if one incarnates in a male body they want a male experience - as in, polarized with the other gender. However, our planet has "difficult vibratory conditions" making those who identify more on a soul level with one gender bypass their "incarnate programming" to lean towards another gender. This doesn't mean that every gay man wants to be a woman. But what it does mean is that many gay men identify with the female energy signature, therefore making a polarized relationship with another male energy signature possible. Notice, Ra uses male/female and female/male to describe gender. One energy is just slightly more dominant.

Ra says "these confusions", meaning a confusion of the intention of bisexuality. We live in an archetypical universe designed by our Logos - who had a fondness for the male/female dichotomy. But, I think Ra's answer also supports that entities are aware of the difficult vibrations of our planet right now, so might knowingly incarnate in a body/location where they would be more inclined towards homosexuality. So, no real judgement as a mistake or confusion on the entity's personal choices - a "confusion" on the magnetic intentions of the polarized bisexual nature of reality.

31.9 Questioner: Why does density of population create these confusions?

Ra: I am Ra. The bisexual reproductive urge has as its goal, not only the simple reproductive function, but more especially the desire to serve others being awakened by this activity.

In an over-crowded situation where each mind/body/spirit complex is under a constant bombardment from other-selves it is understandable that those who are especially sensitive would not feel the desire to be of service to other-selves. This also would increase the probability of a lack of desire or a blockage of the red-ray reproductive energy.

In an uncrowded atmosphere this same entity would, through the stimulus of feeling the solitude about it, then have much more desire to seek out someone to whom it may be of service thus regularizing the sexual reproductive function.

I think Ra is saying that it's easier to make a choice to choose a partner based on sexual attraction almost primarily as opposed to social/sexual attraction. An entity through the stimulus of solitude would want to seek out a partner that it could make more humans with - therefore have a family, create a homestead where all the entities contribute to maker a greater whole. This would also require more "wooing", as in, you have less entities to choose from, so you have to treat each more delicately - and you also can't just risk alienating everyone by hitting on everyone. Lots of entities in cities have that luxury!!

31.10 Questioner: Roughly how many previous incarnations, shall we say, would a male entity in this incarnation have had to have had in the past as a female to have a highly homosexual orientation in this incarnation? Just roughly.

Ra: I am Ra. If an entity has had roughly 65% of its incarnations in the sexual/biological body complex, the opposite polarity to its present body complex, this entity is vulnerable to the aura infringement of your urban areas and may perhaps become of what you call an homosexual nature.

It is to be noted at this juncture that although it is much more difficult, it is possible in this type of association for an entity to be of great service to another in fidelity and sincere green-ray love of a nonsexual nature thus adjusting or lessening the distortions of its sexual impairment.

Now I am going out on a limb, but I think it's possible that an interpretation of the bolded line might be that an homosexual entity can have a nonsexual polarized relationship with an entity of the opposite sex that is not sexual in nature to help "lessen the distortions of its sexual impairment" i.e. learn in this lifetime to have a green-ray relationship with the opposite sex, which was the intention of choosing the biologically polarized body that we have. An entity who has been 65% male who incarnates as a female, may still want to have relationships with other females. Learning to have a green-ray nonsexual relationship with another male can help said entity still experience the intended polarized green-ray exchange.

I think it is entirely possible for two entities of the same biological gender to have a sexual energy exchange, and I do not think anything Ra says contradicts this. This isn't about biological gender. Biological gender just makes it more efficient.

31.11 Questioner: Timothy Leary, doing research, wrote that at the time of puberty, and up through that time, there is an imprint occurring on the DNA coding of an entity and that, for instance, sexual biases are imprinted due to early sexual experiences or some of the first sexual experiences of the entity. Does anything like this actually happen?

Ra: I am Ra. This is partially correct. Due to the nature of solitary sexual experiences, it is in most cases unlikely that what you call masturbation has an imprinting effect upon later experiences.

This is similarly true with some of the encounters which might be seen as homosexual among those of this age group. These are often, instead, innocent exercises in curiosity.

However, it is quite accurate that the first experience in which the mind/body/spirit complex is intensely involved will indeed imprint upon the entity for that life experience a set of preferences.

I think Ra is speaking VERY broadly here, and not just about homosexuality. I think they are speaking of all experiences. However, I do not think they are implying that we should indoctrinate children with heterosexual sex - in fact, I've known women who sought out relationships with other woman because their first experience with a man was traumatizing. The nature of the "first experience" of anything is many-layered and sets up the dominoes for our future possibility/probabilities. If it's good, we're gonna want more, if it's bad, we're gonna want something else.

31.12 Questioner: Does the Orion group use this, shall we say, as a gateway to impressing upon entities, shall we say, preferences which could create negative polarization?

Ra: I am Ra. Just as we of the Confederation attempt to beam our love and light whenever given the opportunity, including sexual opportunities, so the Orion group will use an opportunity if it is negatively oriented or if the individual is negatively oriented.

This is possibly a slight prejudice on Don to ask this question. However, please also understand that Don was celibate so sex of any kind was pretty out of his realm of comfort. Ra spins Don's biased question to being, again, something extremely broad - that anything we see as a distortion within ourselves can be used by the Orion entity. Ra does not confirm that Orion specifically targets those with homosexual inclinations to make them "wrongly sexually oriented". But, I think the whole realm of sexual relationships is a very easy area to have "unpure"/"distorted" ideas, due to our weird society - the red ray and orange rays are always an easy target to trigger distortions.

Then Don takes a turn and begins talking about Nazis who received sexual gratification from horrific means, i.e. killing people. He wasn't talking about homosexuality, but again, Don started thinking about "bad sex" and went to the darkest place he could think of. Ra then stresses/confirms that it isn't a negative entity who makes another entity make the choices that they do, the entity is responsible for its own choices: negatives will just energize them. No one is at the whims of a negative entity.

Anyway. I'm not sure if this helps or not, I brought this up with my husband and he was very upset by some of the wording Ra uses as well. I think if you're more familiar with Ra terminology, it's not as jarring. However, another thing to keep in mind is that Ra could access Don's own mind complex distortions while they were answering his questions - and again, Don wasn't fond of sexual congress in any way, let alone what were likely his distorted thoughts towards homosexual sex, what with being in the military during the middle of the last century. Ra had to be pretty clinical and detached describing these things to Don.