Synchronicity

[anagogy]

Hello,
I'd like to discuss the subject of "synchronization" or "life clues", call it whatever.
It seems to me that this cannot take action unless ones beliefs are allowing so. Yet it's everywhere, you can go back to childhood and remember liking something silly and of no importance, yet you view it now and it all makes perfect sense.
Where does it go? Will this always trigger an awakening, as some sort of clue by your higher self?
I see no end and I'm already awakened, I don't know what to expect. Lately I've been having a feeling I cannot completely comprehend as if an end is near, maybe mine.
There was a post I've read by YingYang, he described a sync so powerful you cannot mistake the existence of beyond. Are we the only ones who notice?
Surely every each and one receives such clue, you can ignore it but the sub-conscious will keep chasing. Yet society keeps itself ignorant, I ask why. Why cannot they see that life is more than logic if everything is so illogical.
Nature works in such a perfect, complex, yet simple way as if magic is in play, as if every atom and particle is connected to another.

Every stage of evolution is perfect. I'm often fond of saying that a caterpillar is not wrong because it is not yet a butterfly. If someone appears spiritually asleep is is only in comparison that it appears so. A cat is a more aware than a rock, and a human is more aware than a cat, and a 4D extraterrestrials spiritual awareness makes our intelligence level look like a child's plaything by comparison. The point is there are always greater heights to grow towards, and every being is dealing with the level of concentration of the light of truth that they can presently handle. You are absolutely right about the beliefs. Evidence of the larger reality will be repelled from one's perception to the exact same degree as the purity of the disbelief in it. Perception is extremely fluid in this regard. Thus, if all you believe in is the physical world, as a materialist does, anything that does not fit into that square peg will be reinterpreted so that it is forced through that square peg or left out of one's worldview altogether. This is why there is the 'hard problem of consciousness' in ontology and neuroscience, because if you presume the world is made up of a bunch of unconscious "stuff" (the common conception of matter), you then have to rationalize how said unconscious stuff magically becomes conscious when arranged in a certain pattern (after all, one could imagine an identical world with automatons that have no consciousness so why is this seemingly unnecessary component there nonetheless?). Nevermind the fact that nobody has ever experienced anything outside of consciousness their entire lives. Rather than accept the obvious conclusion that consciousness is fundamental, a materialist will, ironically, prefer to *religiously* hold to their belief in materialism than entertain the heretical notion that parapsychology experiments and various quantum mechanics evidence is clearly pointing to: that matter actually is a product of consciousness rather than the other way around.

This is long and somewhat dry but talks about the bias and taboo in scientific research: science and the taboo of psi

I find the substance of the lecture inspiring because it is evidence that there are still some truly objective scientists out there that actually give weight to anomalous evidence and are not caving into the peer pressure of group think.