The "withheld" topic

[third-density-being]

(...)
Any guesses why they felt it necessary to add that last sentence and what more there might be to say. And the meaning of "cannot" in contrast with the separately added "need not"? I think the bottom line is, there is more that could be / could have been said.

The only reason that comes to my Mind is that of preservation of Our Free Will (“cannot say”). If Ra would specifically point one “choice” as “better”/”proper” over the other, some People might follow His/Her/Its/Their suggestion due to Ra’s authority, that One might build within His/Her Mind/Heart – in other words some-One might feel obligated to follow direction of “more enlightened” Being / Being “more aligned with Oneness”.

On the other hand Ra did somewhat answered this question by giving an example of Jesus – a fifth density Being – a density of Wisdom. Therefore while Being of density of Compassion (fourth) still struggle with such choice, Wisdom (fifth density) brings sureness of One’s actions. Therefore there was no point in speaking on this subject further with third density Being (“need not say”).


All I have Best in me for You