03-10-2016, 02:48 PM
(03-09-2016, 08:15 PM)anagogy Wrote:(03-09-2016, 04:28 PM)IndigoGeminiWolf Wrote: Have we been through everything already?
We were once part of Infinity, so is the journey we are making now through the densities a repeat?
Have we already made it through to the next Octave? Have we actually experienced Infinity?
In my opinion, IGW, I don't think that infinity ever changes. It contains all potentiality, and there is no difference between the manifest and the unmanifest there. We can't really understand the magnitude of it, because it seems very much like we are experiencing differences and changes. I feel I sometimes get small glimpses of the ultimate reality and I like to think I am somewhat adept at constructing prose, but words still fail me when I try to describe the ultimate. It is extremely difficult. It's difficult to reconcile the idea that "infinity never changes" with the very human perception/illusion of "not being the whole of existence".
Some people find the concept disturbing initially, but nothing is being added or subtracted by these experiences we are having. In the short term it appears that it is, but when all is said and done after the densities, everything will be exactly the same as it was before it started. Nothing is added or subtracted. I know some will argue with that, but infinity cannot become more infinite. It already contains all. There are portions where it appears as if part of the creator is growing or expanding, but that is also part of the illusion. Our existence is simply that portion of infinity that is looking at itself from a 3rd density perspective. That portion of infinity has always existed -- an infinity of probable perspectives stretching through so many different worlds, universes, and octaves that we couldn't even properly grasp it. And it will always exist. And the unified waters of consciousness are seemingly passing through all these probable perspectives.
The only analogy I can give you is that it is sort of like we are looking at a beautiful picture (perhaps even a fractal would be an apropos analogy). Imagine that you were so focused on a portion of that picture that that is all you saw, just one little tiny speck. After a while of looking at this tiny speck of the picture, the whole of your awareness is naturally, and creatively, attracted to another part of the painting, and eventually you broaden your view a little bit, and see more of the picture. And this keeps happening, until the whole of the picture is in your view in all its splendid glory. Now, when you broadened your view, that little speck you were originally focusing on didn't go away, it is still there, but your perspective is just broader. Creation is like that. The perspectives are all there, and always will be there, but when you are so absolutely focused on the specific and personal, you limit your natural awareness of being able to take in the universal and impersonal whole.