03-03-2016, 11:36 AM
(03-03-2016, 11:18 AM)earth_spirit Wrote: I agree with Minyatur. Some Ra channellings you quoted never *quite* resonated with me in this sense.
That's interesting. I've always resonated with most all of what Ra offered.
(03-03-2016, 11:18 AM)earth_spirit Wrote: IMHO it is quite feasible for an incarnate STS entity to see "others" as Creator, extensions of himself to be bent to his will.
If "illusion" and "falsity" is interchangeable, then the term STO itself is a falsity.
IMHO I need not see through illusions to be STO. Such seeking would be a tool, not a requirement. Likewise I need not obscure the truth to be STS. Such (self)deception would be a tool, again not a requirement.
You sound too assuming when you say "they want this" / "they don't want that". I would ask you to perhaps not present your opinions in absolute terms, but the burden is on the reader not to take anything at face value.
I never said you have to see through illusions to be STO, just that they are *trying* to see through illusion (as the Ra quote I posted above stated). Therefore, its not an assumption, it is what Ra said, so the question is whether you accept what Ra said about STO or not, which is your business entirely. Ra also stated in the quotes I shared above that the negative path is more heavily dependent on the illusory separation between selves. Again, not an assumption -- explicitly stated by Ra in the Law of One.
Why would negative polarity want to get rid of the very illusion of separation that grants them power? Separation is the only place in which you may have power over other selves. The only place where CONTROL may be exercised.
I would ask you to consider some assumptions you may be making about the nature of negative polarity yourself.