-

[spero]

Why not just use adult filmstars? Their consent to be in your sexual fantasies is pretty much implied by the nature of the work and the same could be said of many sexual exhibitionist on the internet.

using as a template, those people that have shown a willingness to share their sexuality in a public manner is perhaps the least distorted level of consent you will get. rather than assuming someone is 'asking' to be in your sexual fantasies just because they are famous for example.

secondly, i think we also have somewhat misguided/cultural conditioning/veiled mind thing going on around sexuality that we feel it's somehow taboo to feel sexual desire towards people especially if its not reciprocated, homosexual desires adding a further overlay regarding its acceptance in society, resulting in guilt when we fantasize about it.

Lastly, an example i find amusing is Ra's description of pre-veiled sexual interactions because it runs counter to what societal convention would have us do post-veil i.e. get their name first

 

94.10...
However, because of the unique biases of each mind/body/spirit complex there are sometimes quite simple instances of distortion when there is no apparent cause for such distortion. Let us use the example of the virile and immature male who meets and speaks clearly with a young female whose physical form has the appropriate configuration to cause, for this male entity, the activation of the red-ray sexual arousal.

The words spoken may be upon a simple subject such as naming, information as to the occupation, and various other common interchanges of sound vibratory complex. The male entity, however, is using almost all the available consciousness it possesses in registering the desirability of the female. Such may also be true of the female.

Thusly an entire exchange of information may be meaningless because the actual catalyst is of the body. This is unconsciously controlled and is not a conscious decision. This example is simplistic.

[font=sans-serif]95.19...
 I am Ra. Given this same case; that is, the random red-ray sexual arousal being activated in both male and female, the communication would far more likely have been to the subject of the satisfying of that red-ray, sexual impulse. When this had occurred other information such as the naming could be offered with clear perception. It is to be noted that the catalyst which may be processed by the pre-veil experience is insignificant compared to the catalyst offered to the thoroughly bemused male and female after the veil.[/font]