02-19-2016, 11:45 AM
I think this ties in to the denial/acceptance spectrum. By invalidating an idea you are denying its existence as opposed to accepting it. If it's an idea or thought that is not serving you, you may with to let it go. The problem with resolution/"healing" in these instances, and most instances, is that people try to suppress/deny/invalidate their feelings instead of accepting, integrating, and understanding them. If you deny/invalidate the existence of what you deem as a "problem", no "healing" can occur because the mind is telling itself that no healing needs to occur.
As an example, say one gets an injury to the body. There is a lot of pain. You take painkillers. This negates the body's natural reaction to the catalyst, and then the body and mind are able to forget that the catalyst exists, which forces it along the path to more intense catalyst. Instead, if you get an injury, and accept its existence as a learning tool or cue, immediately you send messages to the body that there is an injury that needs to be healed, and the body can respond with the proper electro-chemical response.
As an example, say one gets an injury to the body. There is a lot of pain. You take painkillers. This negates the body's natural reaction to the catalyst, and then the body and mind are able to forget that the catalyst exists, which forces it along the path to more intense catalyst. Instead, if you get an injury, and accept its existence as a learning tool or cue, immediately you send messages to the body that there is an injury that needs to be healed, and the body can respond with the proper electro-chemical response.