01-28-2016, 02:41 AM
IN ALL HONESTY (might just be drunk, so, please, take this with a grain of salt), that the Law of Responsibility should not incite suffering, it should incite responsibility, there is something innately wrong or improper if you do not accept the term wrong, about the way this is handled if Responsibility causes suffering.
Responsibility is not a cause for suffering, maybe anxiety or stress, but suffering??? Very few things should cause suffering. Pain. Absence.
But responsibility? That makes no sense to me. Responsibility was a manner of joy for me, once it brings suffering, there is obviously a problem
(-is surprised I understood OTOH as On The Other Hand, feels like a moment of connection as I've never come across that acronym before-)
Responsibility is not a cause for suffering, maybe anxiety or stress, but suffering??? Very few things should cause suffering. Pain. Absence.
But responsibility? That makes no sense to me. Responsibility was a manner of joy for me, once it brings suffering, there is obviously a problem
(-is surprised I understood OTOH as On The Other Hand, feels like a moment of connection as I've never come across that acronym before-)