01-26-2016, 12:05 PM
Min, I don't resonate with polarity as being either STO or STS with no inbetween.
In this place of Polarized Manifestation it is Impossible to not be within Polarity. Hence I've my own concept of Polarity as it actually is from my experience. Sts/sto causes too much strife, judgment, and confusion for my taste. The lowest I'll go is 4 polarities. But in my opinion every singular facet has an infinite nature of facets.
The 4 really just being
STO-STS
STS-STO
STS-STO/STO-STS
STO-STS/STS-STO
Where as the Ra version is closer to STO-STO/STS-STS
Which is just not enough to make sense to me as it implies they are separate.
(Really hoping my dyslexia didn't mess me up)
A1, I'll take over the thread for you
Would you say why you dislike split threads of this nature? (I ask because I do too.)
In this place of Polarized Manifestation it is Impossible to not be within Polarity. Hence I've my own concept of Polarity as it actually is from my experience. Sts/sto causes too much strife, judgment, and confusion for my taste. The lowest I'll go is 4 polarities. But in my opinion every singular facet has an infinite nature of facets.
The 4 really just being
STO-STS
STS-STO
STS-STO/STO-STS
STO-STS/STS-STO
Where as the Ra version is closer to STO-STO/STS-STS
Which is just not enough to make sense to me as it implies they are separate.
(Really hoping my dyslexia didn't mess me up)
A1, I'll take over the thread for you

Would you say why you dislike split threads of this nature? (I ask because I do too.)