Learning for Another Self

[Plenum]

Yeah Parsons, it's some 'area' I'm trying to explore right now: sort of themed around yellow-ray, and the interactions with other selves.  There's a few other threads of mine which coalesce around this 'theme'; of organisation (group-effort), the nature of 'consent', and how/what learning is, and what we actually 'do' when we interact, try to gauge a situation, and then assess what our contribution to that interaction is.  

On one level, it might be overthinking things, and not going with the spontaneous flow.  But on another level - especially in trying to further examine the nature of yellow ray in third density - it's something which we can definitely use to polarize positive; in the same way that the 'other side' uses yellow ray to polarise negative.

If we could bring in another Ra quote, which is lengthy, but probably speaks to many of the issues I'm still getting a handle on, I think it's appropriate and apt.

18.6 Questioner: Basically I would say that to infringe on the free will of another self or another entity would be the basic thing never to do under the Law of One. Can you state any other breaking of the Law of One than this basic rule?

Ra: I am Ra. As one proceeds from the primal distortion of free will, one proceeds to the understanding of the focal points of intelligent energy which have created the intelligences or the ways of a particular mind/body/spirit complex in its environment, both what you would call natural and what you would call man-made. Thus, the distortions to be avoided are those which do not take into consideration the distortions of the focus of energy of love/light, or shall we say, the Logos of this particular sphere or density. These include the lack of understanding of the needs of the natural environment, the needs of other-selves’ mind/body/spirit complexes. These are many due to the various distortions of man-made complexes in which the intelligence and awareness of entities themselves have chosen a way of using the energies available.

Thus, what would be an improper distortion with one entity is proper with another. We can suggest an attempt to become aware of the other-self as self and thus do that action which is needed by other-self, understanding from the other-self’s intelligence and awareness. In many cases this does not involve the breaking of the distortion of free will into a distortion or fragmentation called infringement. However, it is a delicate matter to be of service, and compassion, sensitivity, and an ability to empathize are helpful in avoiding the distortions of man-made intelligence and awareness.

The area or arena called the societal complex is an arena in which there are no particular needs for care for it is the prerogative/honor/duty of those in the particular planetary sphere to act according to its free will for the attempted aid of the social complex.

Thus, you have two simple directives: awareness of the intelligent energy expressed in nature, awareness of the intelligent energy expressed in self to be shared, when it seems appropriate, by the entity with the social complex, and you have one infinitely subtle and various set of distortions of which you may be aware; that is, distortions with respect to self and other-selves not concerning free will but concerning harmonious relationships and service to others as other-selves would most benefit.

/ /

but I think your quote is quite apt; and probably speaks to the heart of the issue, more directly.

We may not be able to teach/learn enlightenment; but we can certainly share information and inspiration, when it's relevant, and when there is a calling for it from the other-self - whether that be an explicit expression for interaction, or one that is discerned by the one choosing to offer an opportunity for an interaction.