01-15-2016, 04:07 PM
How can you show me love? Well, when you hurt someones feelings or continually insult them, whether intentional or not, you could try apologizing.
I'm sorry for getting upset, but I am free to get upset when you keep telling me the same thing over and over that I already am aware of as your continual responses to my posts where I mention the honest existence of what I've come to discover outside, as also being inside.
Why don't you try adjusting your view to fit my own instead of continually trying to pull me into yours? I already understand your view completely. I used to, and still agree with you. This is a perfect example of STS/STO behavior, where regardless of the intent or reasoning, I cannot decipher whether you are telling me because you care about me, or telling me because you care about your opinion which doesn't match mine yet is basically the same thing without the added element of 'ALLLLLL' things ARE the OIC, YOU, and the Universe.
Why does darkness need to be 'dark'? Calling it negative is a misnomer as I don't view anything anymore as positive or negative and frankly describing it as negative takes away the ability for comparisons. It's harder to compare Negative to Positive for me, I have an infinitely better time imagining it as Darkness upon varying degrees of a Shade of Light which is anywhere from darker than black to lighter than white. I call it darkness, I don't view it as dark as in not illuminated or luminescent but as in a label that we've given to describe the placement upon that scale of Light.
All things are Light, scientifically, Darkness is an Illusion, in the complete use of the word, Darkness is actually the Absence of Light (in the context of the LOO you should view the phrase Absence of Light as a 'lower' state of Being or less dense in terms of packedness.) And the Absence of Light = Dark physically, not so much metaphysically since metaphysically there is no 'absence' of Light, only infinitely lesser gradients of it.
I don't know how I'm supposed to relay these concepts honestly, with how muddied and absolutely horrid the English language is when applied to describing nonpolarity. I call something dark and explain something, and someone else comes in and says the same thing in a different way while essentially telling me I'm wrong and confused at the exact same time. And there is nothing actually wrong with that, there is something wrong with me, getting so quickly upset at it.
I'll take the blame for poor communication skills on my part. I truly do wish I was better at expressing these concepts... I apologize Adonai and Min, I understand where you both are coming from, I shouldn't be so snappy :-/
I'm sorry for getting upset, but I am free to get upset when you keep telling me the same thing over and over that I already am aware of as your continual responses to my posts where I mention the honest existence of what I've come to discover outside, as also being inside.
Why don't you try adjusting your view to fit my own instead of continually trying to pull me into yours? I already understand your view completely. I used to, and still agree with you. This is a perfect example of STS/STO behavior, where regardless of the intent or reasoning, I cannot decipher whether you are telling me because you care about me, or telling me because you care about your opinion which doesn't match mine yet is basically the same thing without the added element of 'ALLLLLL' things ARE the OIC, YOU, and the Universe.
Why does darkness need to be 'dark'? Calling it negative is a misnomer as I don't view anything anymore as positive or negative and frankly describing it as negative takes away the ability for comparisons. It's harder to compare Negative to Positive for me, I have an infinitely better time imagining it as Darkness upon varying degrees of a Shade of Light which is anywhere from darker than black to lighter than white. I call it darkness, I don't view it as dark as in not illuminated or luminescent but as in a label that we've given to describe the placement upon that scale of Light.
All things are Light, scientifically, Darkness is an Illusion, in the complete use of the word, Darkness is actually the Absence of Light (in the context of the LOO you should view the phrase Absence of Light as a 'lower' state of Being or less dense in terms of packedness.) And the Absence of Light = Dark physically, not so much metaphysically since metaphysically there is no 'absence' of Light, only infinitely lesser gradients of it.
I don't know how I'm supposed to relay these concepts honestly, with how muddied and absolutely horrid the English language is when applied to describing nonpolarity. I call something dark and explain something, and someone else comes in and says the same thing in a different way while essentially telling me I'm wrong and confused at the exact same time. And there is nothing actually wrong with that, there is something wrong with me, getting so quickly upset at it.
I'll take the blame for poor communication skills on my part. I truly do wish I was better at expressing these concepts... I apologize Adonai and Min, I understand where you both are coming from, I shouldn't be so snappy :-/