This is not a density of knowing

[Plenum]

Verum; your thread title is referencing a piece of Ra, but I think it's worth quoting the entire section, so that perhaps a short snippet doesn't lead to misinterpretation, due to lack of context for the words/sentiment offered.

This is the Q&A:

61.9 Questioner: This brings out the point of the purpose for the physical incarnation, I believe. And that is to reach a conviction through your own thought processes as to a solution to problems and understandings in a totally unbiased or totally free situation with no proof at all or anything that you would consider proof, proof being a very poor word in itself. Can you expand on my concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Your opinion is an eloquent one although somewhat confused in its connections between the freedom expressed by subjective knowing and the freedom expressed by subjective acceptance. There is a significant distinction between the two.

This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.

That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density.

As in all discussions about the nature of 3rd density, and the construction of the physical vehicle that we utilise here, the Veil is of primary importance.  It's the Veil - and the subsequent occlusion and confuscation of the roots of mind which make the catalyst here in 3d it's defining feature.  If we truly knew the roots of our catalyst, there would be no 'choice' as such.  We could see everything, and where it came from.  There would be no possible interpretation that it came from 'somewhere else' - which enables the possibility of interpreting things as separation, ie the negative path.  And likewise, there would be no willful attempt to see things as being of a unitary nature; thus no attempt at positive service.  There would be the divine blissfulness of an eternal 'all is well', and thus nothing at all needs to be done.

I think the 'knowing' being referenced is not about facts or knowledge, which is how many people interpret knowing.  

/ /

So blindly believing any metaphysical material that has its core in the unknown, is dogmatic by its very nature, and however many correspondences are found in the various materials does not account to knowledge.

The unknown is definitely the mysterious, and leads any seeker onwards.  Blind belief is definitely not the domain of any thinking, aware, discerning or astute individual.  Many here have not arrived at Ra via the arts, but the sciences.  Don was a man of the sciences.  There is a precision and an exactitude which is at the heart of this communications.

I think the text of the 106 Sessions that we have can be used as a springboard and a rough map for further personal investigative seekings.  It is by no means definitive.

The self is the object of study.  For if all is One, then the Self is the only thing to study.  

So in looking out at a Unified Creation, if it's seen through the lens or perspective that it is 'of the self', that puts a totally different spin and approach to it.  It changes the fundamental nature of the 'viewing', and subsequently, the 'viewer'.

/ /

Is it wise to just remain mundane even though there is an indescribable urge to find and explore 'what is beyond'?

the thing is, we can know, and know things of great value and importance.  It's just that we can't know everything.

I think it's the dichotomy between the lower triad (red/orange/yellow chakras), and the upper triad (green/blue/indigo).  They aren't opposed.  It isn't a case of choosing one or the other.  You can have a foot in both worlds.

Psychic Abilities will develop inevitably as a result of indigo ray work.  You can then get a fair taste of just exactly how much 'knowing' you can handle at that point

Is it optimal to practice the heart in that secular wisdom and love which is not influenced by extraterrestrial beings or higher dimensions? Thank you.

even though this is '3rd desnsity', and our physical plane overlaps with the 1st and 2nd density expressions of Creation, we are by no means insulated and isolated from so-called 'higher' dimensions.  We are subject to ongoing influence and interaction with such beings.  This is a unified creation, after all.  The Quarantine was only strengthened to the degree that it was because of some overexuberant interference from an overhelpful positive entity/group.

Otherwise, I think it's a misnomer to think that 3d planets exist and operate in isolation from higher density groups - of both orientations.  We all influence each other at each level of Creation.

At the deepest level of influence, the Higher Self is something that can be invited, and that is a being of 6d orientation.

In terms of actual living, everything indeed should be grounded in the plane in which you find yourself.  Disowning (and dissociating) from our physical beingness does no-one any good.  I think, at heart, that was the question you were asking in the OP.

To work with the clay at hand; and to do (and learn) what we came here to learn and do.

There is a great honor and a privilege to having an incarnated experience.