2nd LOO Question: Creation

[Quantum]

Do you have an underlying assumption that the 2D cockroach is but a single entity? Some food for thought; the roach could have been you, crawling up your own leg.

70.9 Questioner: I think I have an erroneous concept of the mind/body/spirit complex that, for instance, I represent here in this density and my Higher Self. This probably comes from my concept of space and time. I am going to try to unscramble this. The way I see it right now is that I am existing in two different locations, here and in mid-sixth-density, simultaneously. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. You are existing at all levels simultaneously. It is specifically correct that your Higher Self is you in mid-sixth-density and, in your way of measuring what you know of as time, your Higher Self is your self in your future.

Regarding the evolution of the roach in context of the soul; I would imagine that the form of the roach offers particular lessons, in which the soul incarnates in to learn. Just as a new driver hops into a slow vehicle. A different form will offer a different experience. In this case, a faster car with satellite navigation, or, a roach with low-profile tyres and go faster stripes.
...Either way, the evolution of consciousness is not tied directly to the environment-driven evolution of the physical vehicle. The soul and the vehicle are merely a match for a particular experience/opportunity for growth.
...Are there an infinite number of souls incarnating? We can only make (un)educated guesses based upon fragments of information from Ra. Intuition is our friend here, as we're attempting to measure/quantify the ineffable, a mystery even Ra does not attempt to plumb :¬)

Its my great pleasure to make your acquaintance Namaste. Very interesting words on your part indeed. And a most perfect jewel found as given by Ra to accompany them. Thank you.
1. Is the cockroach me?
2. If Don occupied 3D and 6D in simultaneity, and was further instructed by Ra that he occupied all densities in simultaneity, then as Paul Simon sang, "I am (in fact) a Rock."
3. Let us bend our minds further then, in play and wonderment. If by extrapolating same against the words of Ra, we then may also in a very elementarily fashion infer that I occupy all sub-densities, and sub-sub-densities, and sub-sub-sub densities, and sub-sub-sub-sub etc ad infinitum all densities 1-7 as well. Wouldn't you agree?
4. As such, it causes one to wonder then if I also in simultaneity just as likely occupy all Octaves also.
5. As space is non-restrictive to either my mind, or the analogy, much less the concept, then it stands to reason that I may also occupy all spaces at once in all densities at once as well, as in the illusion of all places/spaces at once, from here to infinity.
6. Lastly, we come to the illusory concept of time, and its illusory times therein. I then may deduce that I occupy all time, and time(s) therein at once as well. What do you think?

By the Ra quote, I think then we've pieced together a rather profound find, that although is unintentionally bantered about more often than not nonchalantly as if a mantra, i.e. that "all is one", has perhaps imbued itself indeed with more substance as a direct result of the said Ra quote. Each jewel of the Ra material is a fundamental find. I believe this one to be exteremely significant. Let us see if we may gently request that this thread then remain on topic to the LOO, as was my previous intent and repeated request, much less that the name of the thread itself not be changed, so that we may explore further together. Rather than politicizing the Ra Material vis-a-vis religion or politics, or trivializing it by creating divisiveness through it, this is my greater reason for being here at B4th, to dig deeper into the LOO itself, as opposed to the transient nature of those things peripheral to it. I may find untold wealths of sources to politics and religion in untold volumes written by an untold number of great minds, but am only able to find discourse on the LOO in but one open and freer repository: Bring4th.org. Allow me then to thank the originators of B4th as much as yourself Namaste for this opportunity. Let us continue:
So, It stands to reason then very definitely by this Ra quote that I am/may be in all things at once. I am therefore infinity (and let us see what happens with this statement?). If by your suggestion that I am the Cockroach (yuck), am I then you in the cockroach as well? Therefore I am you too? Or are you suggesting that you are a different cockroach, which then leads us back into the trap of dividing the rays of sunshine as though different from its source. As suggested in my previous post above, a drop of water from the ocean can not be divided unto itself as something different from itself, and though we struggle vigorously to do so, it is still SOURCE irrespectively. We then are par and parcel of SOURCE, and if SOURCE is Infinity itself, as is God itself as the One Infinite Creator, we then are God and infinity undivided.

It may then be suggested that God as GOIC (God/One Infinite Creator) is Infinity Itself, which only seemingly created individuation as the illusion of ITself, but is all of ITself irrespectively as SOURCE, given that SOURCE has the capacity to create the illusion of individuation, but is not individuation?

Curious as to your thoughts on points 1-6 above Namaste, as I am all participants.

~ Q ~