11-15-2015, 04:24 AM
Anything divided by 0 is Infinity.
Nothingness is still something, I don't speak of the 'lack of' type of nothingness, just the illusion of emptiness.
As such, nothing still exists, I can't accept otherwise even if a 6D being who can't plumb 3D depths of catalysts says otherwise. Why are they even used to deter another's view when everyone here generally knows that their communications were:
A. Not specific in general
B. General in context
C. Vastly lacking in explanation
D. Uses without saying when, abstraction (especially non Ra entities)
E. Is not pure contact, with potential errors that we CAN NOT discern as 3D entities.
That's 5 right off the top of my head (That aren't wonky little things) . Nothingness exists in some context. If you'll let a god-level being paint your reality, why not consider the one I posit? I'm just as God-level, just lack the memory to prove it
Plus we need to sync our semantics, nothingness is to me not the absence of, that is in itself its own concept that does not equate to nothing or nothingness.
You could label it a primordial void but that still makes ot a lack of a lack of absence.
In fact all negative negates itself. There is no absence of because its already been/gone, can't be as it is the lack of being, it truly isn't real except in thoughtform or concept or 'abstraction of abstraction'.
The rabit hole goes deep, requestion each layer of understanding, we don't truly know anything, even what we believe may not be as it seems.
Welcome to Fractalholographic Movement based reality. What is can be many things, literal, pun, satire, ironic, sarcastic in context, form, style, postire, being, presence.
(An ironic sarcastic presence, that'd be a sight! )
I actually do think 0 = 1 but no differently from how 6 = 3 or 18 = 9 or 15 = 255.
Its all 1. Whether its 15 1's or 255 1's, they're all just a bunch of one's together as 1. 1 is 1, 5 is 1, 5894 is 1. Divide by itself, result is 1. Divide 1 by 1 you get 1, multiply anything by zero, you get 0.
0 is real. Nothingness isn't?
Do you ever wonder if Ra or 6D is actually informed so much they choose to misinform accidentally on purpose just to have more service of 'correction' to provide? What do you even know, personally, about any 6D being? Anything? Nothing? Something?
A Thing?
Thingy thing any some none thing???
Also, square and circle are the same thing, you just need Phi to see how they are thr same thing with different looks.
Shapes be like Humans. Many types, all the same in some way but unique.
or is that not right sounding? (Trying to explain it in a way that is, is all.)
Nothingness is still something, I don't speak of the 'lack of' type of nothingness, just the illusion of emptiness.
As such, nothing still exists, I can't accept otherwise even if a 6D being who can't plumb 3D depths of catalysts says otherwise. Why are they even used to deter another's view when everyone here generally knows that their communications were:
A. Not specific in general
B. General in context
C. Vastly lacking in explanation
D. Uses without saying when, abstraction (especially non Ra entities)
E. Is not pure contact, with potential errors that we CAN NOT discern as 3D entities.
That's 5 right off the top of my head (That aren't wonky little things) . Nothingness exists in some context. If you'll let a god-level being paint your reality, why not consider the one I posit? I'm just as God-level, just lack the memory to prove it
Plus we need to sync our semantics, nothingness is to me not the absence of, that is in itself its own concept that does not equate to nothing or nothingness.
You could label it a primordial void but that still makes ot a lack of a lack of absence.
In fact all negative negates itself. There is no absence of because its already been/gone, can't be as it is the lack of being, it truly isn't real except in thoughtform or concept or 'abstraction of abstraction'.
The rabit hole goes deep, requestion each layer of understanding, we don't truly know anything, even what we believe may not be as it seems.
Welcome to Fractalholographic Movement based reality. What is can be many things, literal, pun, satire, ironic, sarcastic in context, form, style, postire, being, presence.
(An ironic sarcastic presence, that'd be a sight! )
I actually do think 0 = 1 but no differently from how 6 = 3 or 18 = 9 or 15 = 255.
Its all 1. Whether its 15 1's or 255 1's, they're all just a bunch of one's together as 1. 1 is 1, 5 is 1, 5894 is 1. Divide by itself, result is 1. Divide 1 by 1 you get 1, multiply anything by zero, you get 0.
0 is real. Nothingness isn't?
Do you ever wonder if Ra or 6D is actually informed so much they choose to misinform accidentally on purpose just to have more service of 'correction' to provide? What do you even know, personally, about any 6D being? Anything? Nothing? Something?
A Thing?
Thingy thing any some none thing???
Also, square and circle are the same thing, you just need Phi to see how they are thr same thing with different looks.
Shapes be like Humans. Many types, all the same in some way but unique.
or is that not right sounding? (Trying to explain it in a way that is, is all.)