09-13-2010, 11:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2010, 12:15 AM by Peregrinus.)
Interesting. I take this as definitive proof (not that I needed it, but others do).
I did as this video suggests (though I found the specific photo (Hale Crater) on page 36 instead of 21 - new images being added all the time) and see exactly what he is talking about; precise geometric patterns and shapes which cannot possibly be naturally occurring.
Smudging software was used on portions of this photo, and I expect it was lightened to hide detail, but as he says, reduce brightness, increase contrast, voila you see like you just put on glasses. Negative also shows the structures as well.
Here are three separate images I worked with, and I used different techniques on all three. What one sees is not a lens flair or an anomaly, but the same specific geometric shapes from the different angles, just as if viewing a city from different angles. Enjoy.
mars_close.jpg (Size: 76.26 KB / Downloads: 24)
mars_close2.jpg (Size: 311.65 KB / Downloads: 30)
mars_close3.jpg (Size: 221.73 KB / Downloads: 21)
I did as this video suggests (though I found the specific photo (Hale Crater) on page 36 instead of 21 - new images being added all the time) and see exactly what he is talking about; precise geometric patterns and shapes which cannot possibly be naturally occurring.
Smudging software was used on portions of this photo, and I expect it was lightened to hide detail, but as he says, reduce brightness, increase contrast, voila you see like you just put on glasses. Negative also shows the structures as well.
Here are three separate images I worked with, and I used different techniques on all three. What one sees is not a lens flair or an anomaly, but the same specific geometric shapes from the different angles, just as if viewing a city from different angles. Enjoy.
mars_close.jpg (Size: 76.26 KB / Downloads: 24)
mars_close2.jpg (Size: 311.65 KB / Downloads: 30)
mars_close3.jpg (Size: 221.73 KB / Downloads: 21)