10-01-2015, 11:10 AM
yes, that's elegantly expressed. I grok 
and getting back to the OP, it's the nature of our opinions which then create the boundary conditions of what we are able to usefully experience.
/ /
yes, perhaps being able to fully understand context would involve being able to fully comprehend all the components of catalyst. Which is not something which is available to our currently configured states:
"This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.
That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density."
That doesn't prevent one from trying to formulate principles in which to grasp larger frameworks, it's just that we wouldn't be able to really experience or utilize such principles given our chosen incarnational vehicles.
For eg, I find myself experiencing the effects of catalyst long before the conscious mind even has registered that there has been a shift in experience/vibrational condition. With attentiveness, the gap between onset of catalyst and acknowledgement/recognition of catalyst becomes shortened, but there is still some gap in perception. That's probably because the mind and it's thoughts have a certain inertia, and keeps on moving in a certain direction until attention is deliberately applied to 'look at' changes in one's condition.
and getting back to the OP, it's the nature of our opinions which then create the boundary conditions of what we are able to usefully experience.
/ /
(10-01-2015, 02:43 AM)APeacefulWarrior Wrote: Perhaps one has to have a 5D view to really understand those arrangements. I strongly suspect, at least, I'm distorted in lumping mind and body together in #1, but it's convenient for a 3rd Density perspective.
yes, perhaps being able to fully understand context would involve being able to fully comprehend all the components of catalyst. Which is not something which is available to our currently configured states:
"This is not a dimension of knowing, even subjectively, due to the lack of overview of cosmic and other inpourings which affect each and every situation which produces catalyst. The subjective acceptance of that which is at the moment and the finding of love within that moment is the greater freedom.
That known as the subjective knowing without proof is, in some degree, a poor friend for there will be anomalies no matter how much information is garnered due to the distortions which form third density."
That doesn't prevent one from trying to formulate principles in which to grasp larger frameworks, it's just that we wouldn't be able to really experience or utilize such principles given our chosen incarnational vehicles.
For eg, I find myself experiencing the effects of catalyst long before the conscious mind even has registered that there has been a shift in experience/vibrational condition. With attentiveness, the gap between onset of catalyst and acknowledgement/recognition of catalyst becomes shortened, but there is still some gap in perception. That's probably because the mind and it's thoughts have a certain inertia, and keeps on moving in a certain direction until attention is deliberately applied to 'look at' changes in one's condition.