10-01-2015, 01:04 AM
(10-01-2015, 12:00 AM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: and yet, it would seem that the choice of physical vehicle in each density is to facilitate a certain type of attention to differences, or to emphasise a limited choice of experience. Case in point, the weakening of the 3rd density human vehicle, so that it would encourage a certain type of limited experience.
This is the one thing I have still yet to reconcile in regards to consciousness seeming to evolve with experience, and gaining understandings that 'attach' to the individual soul, and then the prospect/potential of ever-present unity and infinity, which would seem the birthright of every portion of the Creator.
Perhaps you can be more specific about what there is to reconcile Plenum?
I see nothing to reconcile. From my perspective there is no change in the absolute. Evolution is the result of us adopting identification with mind, which involves a duality, a subject/object relationship between inner and outer. In the world of duality, the realm of comparisons, things appear to change and evolve. From the broader perspective of spirit, there is just undistorted stillness.
The best analogy I can think of is: a rock on a table. It is still and not moving. However if you take a powerful microscope and zoom into the subatomic level, there is a whirl of energetic movement. The portion looks different than the whole.
Similarly, we appear to evolve, incarnation by incarnation, lesson by lesson, seemingly moving from grace to grace. But when we arrive at the macro-perspective, we too will see that no change was occurring -- it was merely an artifact of examining a mere portion of our being.