I will speak of my experience;
I speak in such a way that it is sometimes difficult for anyone without a stable belief system in that area.
For instance, I follow a complex type of astrology (which is interesting, today's 'Neutrino Forecast; Now this line is about two things always. Is one serving, or, is one trying to rule. Is one serving one opinion, which means that someone asks you, or the situation asks you, or are you trying to rule? And to impose your opinion?) And carries on in a deeper understanding of this.
So, someone I know is told of that human design and how it affects them. They tolerate it for a while and follow it's individualised rules. Then the day they don't follow the rule, and actually go against it, they break their leg.
I didn't explain this to the person because I know they would have resisted it and are essentially more happy not knowing. When I confided in someone else how it annoyed me that they didn't follow the rule in the first place, I frame my POV in references to Edgar Cayce etc. And the study that proved the chart to something like 90% out of 5000 people. This is just how I talk, and I am getting emotionally tangled over a very provable metaphysical rule. In this area and other areas.
The result, people will subtly resist it; (Types with an irrational clinging to tradition for instance), some will offer emotionalised views with no evidence. But offer them as though they were the highest form of evidence.
Essentially, people aren't going to change, unless their percieved 'god', (which is in a lot of cases authority) will do the thinking for them. This is part of the reason I tend to think most wanderers take on such trauma in order to awaken, the best you can do is make peace with yourself and your own truth.
Another I ching perspective of that chart is 'the resistance to change leads to crisis.'
I speak in such a way that it is sometimes difficult for anyone without a stable belief system in that area.
For instance, I follow a complex type of astrology (which is interesting, today's 'Neutrino Forecast; Now this line is about two things always. Is one serving, or, is one trying to rule. Is one serving one opinion, which means that someone asks you, or the situation asks you, or are you trying to rule? And to impose your opinion?) And carries on in a deeper understanding of this.
So, someone I know is told of that human design and how it affects them. They tolerate it for a while and follow it's individualised rules. Then the day they don't follow the rule, and actually go against it, they break their leg.
I didn't explain this to the person because I know they would have resisted it and are essentially more happy not knowing. When I confided in someone else how it annoyed me that they didn't follow the rule in the first place, I frame my POV in references to Edgar Cayce etc. And the study that proved the chart to something like 90% out of 5000 people. This is just how I talk, and I am getting emotionally tangled over a very provable metaphysical rule. In this area and other areas.
The result, people will subtly resist it; (Types with an irrational clinging to tradition for instance), some will offer emotionalised views with no evidence. But offer them as though they were the highest form of evidence.
Essentially, people aren't going to change, unless their percieved 'god', (which is in a lot of cases authority) will do the thinking for them. This is part of the reason I tend to think most wanderers take on such trauma in order to awaken, the best you can do is make peace with yourself and your own truth.
Another I ching perspective of that chart is 'the resistance to change leads to crisis.'