(08-29-2015, 05:28 PM)Nicholas Wrote: Before I answer your counter question I need to express how I fell about your response here. (friggin smart cookie)
(08-29-2015, 05:28 PM)Nicholas Wrote: He aint got a snowballs chance in hell! How can his green ray be activated in this situation!?
How is he any different from the man in your example? He thinks black people are 'animals' and the man in your example does even worse to actual animals. What's the difference? In both cases, they are selectively 'good' people to other humans that they deem on the same level as themselves, but enslave and/or kill entities that they deem inferior.
The slave 'owner' views black people the same way meat-eaters today view cows: Inferior, OK to enslave, beat, torture, kill...just property.
(08-29-2015, 05:28 PM)Nicholas Wrote: But your counter question totally brings home to me the subjective nature of trying to communicate with words (as well as our desire to change things for the better). Indeed, how can a meat consuming third density entity have an activated heart centre when Ra terms this activation as one of "universal love"? Let alone a 3rd density entity enslaving 50 other 3rd density entities! With your analogy in mind though, what in comparison do 2nd density entities do to each other?
Wild animals tear each other apart but only for survival. Genuine hunger, with No other options. The lion's physiology is designed to crave meat - raw, bloody meat - and his instinct (which is just the word for group mind) teaches him how to hunt. But it's only for survival, never for sport, or just for taste, as humans do. And there is no enslavement.
At any rate, humans are presumably more evolved than the lions, no?
(08-29-2015, 05:28 PM)Nicholas Wrote: So without the political nuance (narrative). Do you think it is possible to graduate from our 3rd density while using 2nd density as a form of 3rd density sustenance?
I'm going to be more generous than you were with the slave 'owner.' You said he didn't have a snowball's chance in hell. Why so harsh?
If I said that about someone eating meat, can you imagine the response I'd get??? OMG everyone would POUNCE on me!
And yet you just said that about someone with nary a ripple of interest.
Why?
What's the difference?
(08-29-2015, 05:28 PM)Nicholas Wrote: There are socio/political/economic/geographical/historical and physiological factors that come into play here, and we are surely assuming an awful lot if we commit to a definitive answer, are we not?
Indeed. Why, then, are you asking me for one?
...