(09-02-2010, 09:54 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: The basic teaching also includes the concepts that you are infinity and that the universe is holographic.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but what I recall is Ra saying we are infinite, not that we are infinity.
It seems to me that the seeming disagreement is based on a confusion of these 2 terms. The arguments put forth seem to be in favor of us being infinite beings, and containing infinity, which I agree with. However, in my opinion, that doesn't mean we are infinity. The reason I see it this way is that, in my understanding, the very definition of infinity is without distortion.
(09-02-2010, 09:54 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Time is also an illusion. In truth, there is only infinity and there is only the present.
Questions:
1. Does Infinity have distortion?
2. Do we have distortion?
3. What is illusion?
(09-03-2010, 08:22 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: I don't see Ra distinguishing infinity from intelligent infinity, which is what I thought you were doing. In their terms, intelligent infinity is the unity, the tao.
Ra sometimes uses the term infinity, and others times the term intelligent infinity. Thus, there is a distinction.