09-01-2010, 05:30 PM
Hey 3D,
I've been thinking about this for a little while and while doing so I came to an idea that I see now you yourself already thought about in this thread, although I failed to notice it with my first read through. It being:
I think this is more likely what we have here. In this way there is greater room for experience- if there were in fact separate negative / positive time/space and space/times, it might limit the creators ability to know itself via the interactions between polarities. It also makes sense since Ra spoke about negatively polarized confederations originating around the Orion constellation, which of course exists in our own space/time. And of course the many times when interactions between negative and positively polarized entities are mentioned. Were such a hard division to exist I might imagine those sorts of interactions would not exist.
To the topic about Carla becoming "trapped" in negative time/space- I think this could be explained in much the same way as an entity could become "trapped" in the middle of a desert, or on an island. It's not that the new environment is a real trap in the sense that there is no possibility of escape, but rather that escape cannot happen immediately. It would have to be done through much work, be it walking hundreds of miles in the case of the desert example, or spending many lifetimes exhibiting a positive polarity in the negative t/s example. Interestingly this might be an avenue for further discussion as, if my previous statement is correct, implies that one could "move" about in time/space to sections with different polarities, much as I imagine you could do in space/time by moving from a planet that is STO oriented (in a futuristic space ship) to a planet that is STS in nature.
I agree with Quantum's statement about the likely appeal an entity of strong negative polarization would see in challenging an entity of strong positive polarization. (The reverse being unlikely as it goes against the positive nature of that entity). Were a strongly negatively polarized entity (hereafter known as SNPE) were to conquer Joe the Plumber, it might not make much difference as I presume it would be like a blade of grass bending in the wind. In other words, "Great, but so what?" But were the SNPE to convince Ghandi that the best way to serve human kind was through violence, the SNPE would then have won a greater reward, as it were. Of course, the reverse might happen and the SNPE would no longer be SN. This is a risk the entity must take- but as with most things one finds to be rewarding, there is some risk involved. And of course this is just the sort of risk that the SPNE of fifth density took on in challenging the L/L group.
As far as where the earth stands in the spectrum of positive or negative space/time time/space, I think an exception must be made, since it is still existing in a third density state. In that sense it may be considered neutral but only in so far as a veil exists for those entities inhibiting it. We might use Venus as a better example. Since Venus is positive, it might actually shed some light on our local space/time cosmological geography. If the positive and negative portions of space naturally segregate much like water and oil, we might assume at least our local solar system is in positive territory. But this would also mean that the area around Orion is probably in negative territory. Compared to the size of the Milky Way, we are actually quite close to this supposed "negative space". Perhaps space/time positivity and negativity can be compared to oil and water, but only if one were to shake the galaxy rigorously so that there exists many pockets or bubbles of oil within the water? Were this to be the case we would then need to disband the idea of the space/time being spread out like the poles of a magnet. But then again I'm only thinking of our three X Y and Z axis', and perhaps that is erroneous.
Great topic!
L&L, ~L
I've been thinking about this for a little while and while doing so I came to an idea that I see now you yourself already thought about in this thread, although I failed to notice it with my first read through. It being:
Quote:It could be that this is conceptually as simple as the polarized areas (s/t or t/s) acting opposite to that of magnets, (i.e., opposites repel, and likes attract). So it is not really t/s and s/t that are "negative" or "positive", but rather the area takes on the "magnetic field" (if you will) of the entities that reside there, and physics precludes their meeting.
I think this is more likely what we have here. In this way there is greater room for experience- if there were in fact separate negative / positive time/space and space/times, it might limit the creators ability to know itself via the interactions between polarities. It also makes sense since Ra spoke about negatively polarized confederations originating around the Orion constellation, which of course exists in our own space/time. And of course the many times when interactions between negative and positively polarized entities are mentioned. Were such a hard division to exist I might imagine those sorts of interactions would not exist.
To the topic about Carla becoming "trapped" in negative time/space- I think this could be explained in much the same way as an entity could become "trapped" in the middle of a desert, or on an island. It's not that the new environment is a real trap in the sense that there is no possibility of escape, but rather that escape cannot happen immediately. It would have to be done through much work, be it walking hundreds of miles in the case of the desert example, or spending many lifetimes exhibiting a positive polarity in the negative t/s example. Interestingly this might be an avenue for further discussion as, if my previous statement is correct, implies that one could "move" about in time/space to sections with different polarities, much as I imagine you could do in space/time by moving from a planet that is STO oriented (in a futuristic space ship) to a planet that is STS in nature.
I agree with Quantum's statement about the likely appeal an entity of strong negative polarization would see in challenging an entity of strong positive polarization. (The reverse being unlikely as it goes against the positive nature of that entity). Were a strongly negatively polarized entity (hereafter known as SNPE) were to conquer Joe the Plumber, it might not make much difference as I presume it would be like a blade of grass bending in the wind. In other words, "Great, but so what?" But were the SNPE to convince Ghandi that the best way to serve human kind was through violence, the SNPE would then have won a greater reward, as it were. Of course, the reverse might happen and the SNPE would no longer be SN. This is a risk the entity must take- but as with most things one finds to be rewarding, there is some risk involved. And of course this is just the sort of risk that the SPNE of fifth density took on in challenging the L/L group.
As far as where the earth stands in the spectrum of positive or negative space/time time/space, I think an exception must be made, since it is still existing in a third density state. In that sense it may be considered neutral but only in so far as a veil exists for those entities inhibiting it. We might use Venus as a better example. Since Venus is positive, it might actually shed some light on our local space/time cosmological geography. If the positive and negative portions of space naturally segregate much like water and oil, we might assume at least our local solar system is in positive territory. But this would also mean that the area around Orion is probably in negative territory. Compared to the size of the Milky Way, we are actually quite close to this supposed "negative space". Perhaps space/time positivity and negativity can be compared to oil and water, but only if one were to shake the galaxy rigorously so that there exists many pockets or bubbles of oil within the water? Were this to be the case we would then need to disband the idea of the space/time being spread out like the poles of a magnet. But then again I'm only thinking of our three X Y and Z axis', and perhaps that is erroneous.
Great topic!
L&L, ~L