Tuning, tuning, tuning...

[Peregrinus]

Having negative conversations in this forum... I would see akin to holding ultimate fighting matches in the Sistine Chapel, a breach of that which is sacred and beautiful. That being said...

1) When mixed or negative material begins making its entrance into our forums, what possible consequences can you foresee in terms of our tuning?

I would suggest that material which contains mixed and/or negative materials not be discussed and removed. Although it is negatively polarizing to control, opening the door to the negative on those unsuspecting would not be a service to other-self action. There are numerous (seemingly) positive channels out there that can be discussed without having to resort to negative channels.

2) What constitutes detuning? (Loss of tuning.)

As some may have noticed recently in this forum, it did not take a great deal for a number of members to become detuned, including myself. This catalyst was, of course, a learning experience for those that took it as such, but for many... an introduction of negative material might be a non-recoverable event which might cause irreversible damage to their fragile state. I ask you to consider to remember that walking the steps of light is based upon balance of the rays, not strength, and we must bear the responsibility to not harm others which may cause blockage to those entities which naturally have none, and have come to this forum seeking a like vibration. As to the question... Any conversation in which the vibration is less than that of yellow ray may cause a reduction in the vibration of the reader, thus, detuning. The current forum guidelines would suffice but for the name of those entities being channeled.

3) What matters more: the content of discussion or the manner in which it is being discussed?

I would suggest that both matter equally. Having a kind conversation involving negative materials will not alleviate the fact that the materials are negative, nor does a negative conversation about positive materials maintain a positive message.

4) What place will material that is not focused on eternal spiritual principles but rather on the transient or on the disempowering or on that which generates fear and paranoia or on the future calamity or on other temporal matters of non-enduring significance have in our forums? Do you wish to draw a line somewhere in the sand or would you rather welcome the entire spectrum of other channeled sources of material?

I would suggest there to be a very clear line that negative material will/would be removed immediately. I think that be having a selection process whereby each week, or each month, a new channel/channeled entity might be suggested, a well known (seemingly) positive one, and then do a poll (with discussion) on this channel/channeled entity to see if anyone has anything negative to say about it. If there is no (viable) negative, it could be added to the board as a sub-subheading and opened for discussion. I see no need to blow up the dam when it can be opened in increments to allow for a steady and predictable flow.

5) More specifically, is it acceptable to dedicate threads to analyzing philosophy concerned with baby-eating reptile-humanoids (an analysis which would happen through the lens of the Law of One) as long as the discussion is carried forward with the spirit of mutual respect so prevalent on the forums?

Anything which may be distorted by the ape mind has repercussions to the mind/body/spirit complex. I would simply say no, discussions of any negative nature are not welcome.

All in all, I would hope that opening a subsection of the forum to outside channels would/should be done so as to encourage positivity and increase the collective vibration. We are not Ra, and cannot afford the luxury to cause naive harm, especially at such a crucial time in the cycle as now.

I respectfully suggest that the new forum include some kind of guideline which encourages an honest, unflinching look at whether or not a tuning process was used by the channels; and if so, how that tuning process compares to Carla's.

There may well be extremely valuable, helpful, positive material received by people who had a total absence of any conscious effort or deliberate ritual towards tuning. If so, the absence of tuning should be noted. In the absence of a tuning practice, there is the risk - not necessarily outcome - of destabilization or perversion of positive into negative through an untuned channel. If the channeler has stated a personal standard of evaluation for which contacts or messages to accept, that should be noted as well.

I have seen of channelers is that it just happens for some, without conscious effort. What is important, I would suggest, is the message, not the messenger. All it takes for a channel to attune to an entity/vice versa is a like vibration.

What should be noted is that LL is not in alignment with, nor does endorse these other channels/channeled entities. According to a 1974 channeling session with Hatonn, this time in the cycle may reveal many channels/channeled entities which are unable to sustain the truth and shall be shown as false. I know this will not be the case for LL, but all others are suspect, at least to me.

Thank you for your consideration of my words dear brothers and sisters