08-25-2010, 04:16 AM
Indeed it really depends on how we ask the questions.
If you ask "do you think in the infinite depths of space there is other life like us?" The count would be 80% If you ask more specific do you believe aliens are visiting us, the count drops to about 50%... These were measured in the united states.
But this Assange guy knows in advance he's going to get attacked and debunked if they can. He knows he cannot reveal his sources. I think you guys are too eager to conclude he would censor himself in this way. What if those who would release ufo information right now release it to the usual pundits? The camelot guys, Wilcock, Icke. Or the ATS forum.. You know the places that pop up first when you start looking for these subjects on the internet. They're all claiming to have boatloads of insiders. Assange just apparently has none.
How true that is remains debatable of course. But if they're in any way close to the truth they will attract whistleblower with extra terrestrial specific information.
If you ask "do you think in the infinite depths of space there is other life like us?" The count would be 80% If you ask more specific do you believe aliens are visiting us, the count drops to about 50%... These were measured in the united states.
But this Assange guy knows in advance he's going to get attacked and debunked if they can. He knows he cannot reveal his sources. I think you guys are too eager to conclude he would censor himself in this way. What if those who would release ufo information right now release it to the usual pundits? The camelot guys, Wilcock, Icke. Or the ATS forum.. You know the places that pop up first when you start looking for these subjects on the internet. They're all claiming to have boatloads of insiders. Assange just apparently has none.
How true that is remains debatable of course. But if they're in any way close to the truth they will attract whistleblower with extra terrestrial specific information.