06-11-2015, 06:59 PM
@Yera
But you make a good point that I want to comment on. There is absolutely no way to know for sure whether my formula is accurate or not. I believe it is because I've been studying astrology in one form or another since I was a kid. Therefore, if someone didn't believe that my formula was accurate, then it wouldn't be infringing upon their free will since they wouldn't inquire more information about their density and would reject it.
But then again, I remember a Ra quote where Don asked Ra what density they were. And I remember that Ra specifically declined to do so. Ra just said that there were two who were 6th density and one who was 5th, but Ra didn't say who was what. So I'm left wondering.
And another point. I've come to realize that my formula doesn't definitively say whether one is a wanderer or not even if it were accurate. Even if it is accurate, it just says what sub-density you're at since we're all presumed to be 3rd density. That's a finer point that is sort of difficult to explain.
But you make a good point that I want to comment on. There is absolutely no way to know for sure whether my formula is accurate or not. I believe it is because I've been studying astrology in one form or another since I was a kid. Therefore, if someone didn't believe that my formula was accurate, then it wouldn't be infringing upon their free will since they wouldn't inquire more information about their density and would reject it.
But then again, I remember a Ra quote where Don asked Ra what density they were. And I remember that Ra specifically declined to do so. Ra just said that there were two who were 6th density and one who was 5th, but Ra didn't say who was what. So I'm left wondering.
And another point. I've come to realize that my formula doesn't definitively say whether one is a wanderer or not even if it were accurate. Even if it is accurate, it just says what sub-density you're at since we're all presumed to be 3rd density. That's a finer point that is sort of difficult to explain.