Ra's Statements About 2D Entities

[Minyatur]

I don't think we perceive the same connotation of the word "negative" in the given context. As I said elsewhere, the "negative" term is probably something "positive" entities came up with.

It's more about the fact that you think it should not be, as such betlittling it because it was not how you went through this reality.

No, you are mistaken, and probably misunderstanding because you don't agree with the philosophy from Ra to begin with. This is a Law of One discussion forum. You have repeatedly stated that you disagree with the concepts taught by Ra, so I wonder why you're even here in the first place. You seem to be insistent on teaching us Law of One students that Ra was wrong. Well, I'm not interested in hearing all your reasons why Law of One concepts are invalid. I'm interested in discussing topics from a Law of One perspective. My views are based on my understanding of the Law of One.

I've never said Ra was wrong, Ra states the Law of One but also his own personal bias. I've also told you that you are picking passages that work your way and which are usually the ones which are not directly about Oneness. Oneness is the ultimate lesson toward which all distortions or sub-lessons are working toward.

The Law of One is that which has no polarity. Polarities exist only in the lack of awareness of unity that is ever present. Ealier in this thread I've quoted many passages that fully support all I've said. The only thing I can have against Ra is that he understand not fully the negative path because it was not part of his experiences so much. That is his work in progress toward his own evolution.

Whatever you say about meat eating, does not Ra say himself that there are no mistakes? How could I be making mistakes from Ra's perspective?

I've also quoted Ra saying that one should not dissuade others from fufilling their desires which is exactly what you are doing with this thread. You can disagree with him but then you won't be his student will you?

Maybe you want me to requote again all these passages? Then you won't say I disagree with the Law of One philosophy when I do not.