05-09-2015, 02:00 PM
(05-09-2015, 01:43 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Would you prefer empty void rather than that the Creator will know Itself? We are manyness, exploring infinite point of views of the Creator of Itself through infinite self and other-selves. This is what we are, this is the purpose of existence in itself. We could've remained rocks or just elements or even massless particles or void, but we're ever evolving toward new kind of experiences and all that happens is part of that.
Reality exists for us to learn from it, not for us to to make it alike how we currently are. Althought doing so can still be part of a catalyst for self and other-selves but it is an impossible road that can only either be a never-ending effort for all of eternity or eventually end in acceptance fo the whole.
I think you mean well, but your words remind me of Christians who employ circular logic to validate their stance.
To the above bolded: what do you mean by this? Do you mean something such as, I (Diana) am a vegetarian and I want to perpetuate that forever and make everyone else agree with me? If so, you are wrong.
You are very sure of what you say. If one of us is rigid (you or me), it's not me. I have only working theories.
Acceptance and faith concerning a Creator is something for followers. I'm not a follower. I can resonate with Intelligent Infinity. But a Creator who sets up rules and how things are (which is in conflict with the idea of infinity) is not for me. And once again, sounds like the Christian version of reality—if you don't accept our way, you go to hell instead of heaven. I like the wave/particle duality and I'll endeavor to stay in the wave function where all possibilities exist.