Why I am not a vegan

[Diana]

 I just noticed something significant!

Don referenced the last session. So, I looked up Session 83, and searched for the word 'protein', and found this:

83.28 Questioner: I noticed you started this session with “I communicate now.” You usually use “We communicate now.” Is there any significance or difference with respect to that, and then is there anything that we can do to make the instrument more comfortable or improve the contact?
Ra: I am Ra. We am Ra. You may see the grammatical difficulties of your linguistic structure in dealing with a social memory complex. There is no distinction between the first person singular and plural in your language when pertaining to Ra.

We offer the following, not to infringe upon your free will, but because this instrument has specifically requested information as to its maintenance and the support group does so at this querying. We may suggest that the instrument has two areas of potential distortion, both of which may be aided in the bodily sense by the ingestion of those things which seem to the instrument to be desirable. We do not suggest any hard and fast rulings of diet although we may suggest the virtue of the liquids. The instrument has an increasing ability to sense that which will aid its bodily complex. It is being aided by affirmations and also by the light which is the food of the density of resting.

We may ask the support group to monitor the instrument as always so that in the case of the desire for the more complex proteins that which is the least distorted might be offered to the bodily complex which is indeed at this time potentially capable of greatly increased distortion.

...in the case of the desire for the more complex proteins...this clearly means that WHEN Carla desires meat, THEN give the LEAST DISTORTED meat.  :exclamation:  :exclamation:  :exclamation:

This supports what I said earlier: Ra was working with Carla where she was at. She already had the desire to eat meat, so Ra gave suggestions on how to minimize any distortion from it; ie. that it must, therefore, cause distortion!

There's really no way this could be construed to say that Ra was encouraging the consumption of meat, even in Carla's case, in my opinion.

This makes sense to me. Thank you Monica. Ra's respect for the free will and the distortions of Carla, regarding advice about her diet, seem to be based on that prime directive: no interference. Rather than making a statement about whether or not eating meat is a compassionate choice (or anything pertaining to the implications of eating meat in general), Ra only addressed Carla's particular situation.

It reminds me of people's belief systems around medicine. If I speak with someone who has cancer, and their faith is in allopathic medicine, I never try to dissemble their beliefs, because that is where their power in healing derives from. If they are interested in alternative things, I will suggest things, but I am very careful not to weaken their beliefs.