02-17-2015, 11:37 PM
(02-17-2015, 11:23 PM)Shemaya Wrote:(02-17-2015, 11:10 PM)Monica Wrote: The Law of One isn't even a religion and we don't even have any sort of moral code. Nor am I in any position of authority, so I couldn't hold my own convictions as a moral standard for others even if I wanted to.
You certainly can within your own mind.
A moral standard is not by way of "authority", it is just a personal or collective standard of conduct as I am using the term.
Clearly, you have a personal standard that eating animals/ animal products is immoral. And many of your posts express incredulity that "spiritual people" do not hold the same conviction. Correct me if I am wrong.
You are right about that. It's more of a vision than a moral standard though.
I don't understand how otherwise 'spiritual' people can think that intentionally, knowingly, unnecessarily causing suffering to other sentient beings is ok.
Religious people, I understand. They follow their book without questioning. But for those who profess to believe in the concepts of service to others, and avoiding the control/domination of others, I don't understand how they can justify the controlling/dominating/killing of sentient other-selves.
If you are implying that I am somehow wrong in having such a vision, then those who hold the vision of a peaceful planet are equally 'wrong.' Yet I doubt that most people here would mind someone posting in their sig "War is STS...unnecessary killing of other humans is inherently STS." Very few would dispute that.