02-10-2015, 02:59 PM
(02-09-2015, 10:28 PM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: I think of the Law of One as a philosophy, first and foremost. That, of course, doesn't prevent people from turning it into dogma, as is the case with almost anything that one forms an emotional attachment to.
I think what inherently sets this philosophy apart, and that is also a safeguard, is that the First Distortion is referenced as the Law of Free Will.
If the Free Will of the self is recognised in oneself, then it can be recognised in others, and then we get to the situation where co-operation, dialogue, and freedom of expression can be the means of interaction; rather than a system of rules which apply to everyone, no matter the circumstances.
I've met Jim and Carla in person, and they are great people. But I don't inherently see them as being any different from you or I.
I agree that the First Distortion sets this philosophy apart, but I'm not sure it it's a safeguard, because it is but one of many concepts, and any concept can be ignored in favor of cherry picking whatever they want to make into a dogma.
I too have gotten to know Jim and Carla, after interviewing them once a week for 3 years. That is many hours of dialog that I enjoyed with them! I agree that they are wonderful people! One of the traits I have always admired about them is that they never put themselves above anyone else. This is why I cringe when I see people trying to put Carla in the position of guru or role model. This isn't fair to Carla, and it's really no different from what religious people do with their pastors, bishop, pope, etc. It's an example of religiosity seeping in.