07-20-2010, 06:17 AM
Actually, I put a great deal of effort into attempting to understand what you were trying to say in your post and in responding, as best I could, to each point you made. In the process, I uncovered significant differences in what you are saying from what Ra was saying, which I am now asking you to clarify. I hope that you will do so.
I am somewhat at a disadvantage in that I only have limited time to read and reply to posts on this forum. That's why I asked you to summarize your thoughts earlier. You said that your thoughts have not changed since your first post and directed me to read the first two pages, which I did. By the way, the fact that your thoughts have not changed since your first post suggests that you have not gained much from the dialog in this thread.
I admit that I haven't read pages three through six of this thread. It may well be that you have answered all the questions and objections that I asked and posed above. If so, I apologize for asking them again. Nevertheless, since you are the one who is posing an interpretation that seems to be significantly at variance with Ra's, I do think it is appropriate for you to do the work of elaborating on your theory and for me, who basically has no problem with Ra's cosmology, to investigate, attempt to understand, and point out the differences between what you are saying and what Ra said. In many cases, those differences can be indicated in one line or in a few words.
I am somewhat at a disadvantage in that I only have limited time to read and reply to posts on this forum. That's why I asked you to summarize your thoughts earlier. You said that your thoughts have not changed since your first post and directed me to read the first two pages, which I did. By the way, the fact that your thoughts have not changed since your first post suggests that you have not gained much from the dialog in this thread.
I admit that I haven't read pages three through six of this thread. It may well be that you have answered all the questions and objections that I asked and posed above. If so, I apologize for asking them again. Nevertheless, since you are the one who is posing an interpretation that seems to be significantly at variance with Ra's, I do think it is appropriate for you to do the work of elaborating on your theory and for me, who basically has no problem with Ra's cosmology, to investigate, attempt to understand, and point out the differences between what you are saying and what Ra said. In many cases, those differences can be indicated in one line or in a few words.