inhabited planets

[dreamliner]

As Ra said, the 35% do *not* fit into the percentiles given for densities in the Milky Way Galaxy, thus, they were not included in the percentiles.

I couldn't follow how that mysterious 35% do not fit into the percentiles.

My guess was/is, that 35% represents the "creatures" such as spirit/mind complexes (mentioned in session 17.38) and/or angelic entities which Ra might have implied in 17.37.

I think its just that portion that is dwelling spiritually as a portion of the Logos.  These are probably different kinds of astrological influences -- the holographic Logos reflecting itself in the very stars and certain planets in significant archetypical patterns and such.  
So we subtract that 35% from the total amount of intelligent planets, because it doesn't dwell at any particular density level, and cannot be classified as such, and Ra took their percentages from the remaining set of intelligent planets which could be reliably pigeon holed into their appropriate density labels.

I don't think that Ra meant "the portion which dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos" by that "mysterious 35%", because the question by Don Elkins was:

"How many inhabited planets are there in our galaxy?" in 16.25.

The inital answer by Ra was:

"We are assuming that you intend all dimensions of consciousness or densities of awareness in this question. Approximately one-fifth of all planetary entities contain awareness of one or more densities. Some planetary spheres are hospitable only for certain densities. Your planetary sphere, for instance, is at this time hospitable to levels or densities one, two, three, and four."

Since there are 67 million planets which contain awareness of one or more densities (as revealed by Ra in 16.26), there must be 67x5=335 million planets totally in milky way. "The portion which dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos" must be the remainder four-fifth (not 35%) of all planets in milky way; that is 335-67=268million.