01-11-2015, 12:11 AM
jody, I wish you every success in this endeavor.
This is a good time to consider how you will ensure the purity of your message. As someone who uses the channeling method very frequently for personal guidance, I have quickly learned that STS types will take every, and I mean every opportunity to insert their nonsense into ongoing communication, often successfully imitating the "voice" of the STO entity one is communicating with. They can also be very subtle in their efforts, so that the deception/misdirection is not immediately obvious.
I've learned that mentally requesting the entity I'm speaking with to add "that is the truth" to the end of every (or nearly every) sentence weeds out 99% of this type of nonsense. There is a cost to them of making that statement, which was described to me as a karmic one, and they are unwilling to take that "hit" the vast majority of the time - but they do it when the potential payoff for them is high enough.
Even Carla, despite amazing purity and skills, was not immune to this - I recall reading a channeled message from Quo where Scientology was randomly referred to in a neutral-to-positive way, for example, a completely unnecessary and glaring "false note" in the message which made it clear what had happened.
The point is, with your messages being intended for a mass audience, it becomes absolutely vital to ensure the integrity of the message.
This is a good time to consider how you will ensure the purity of your message. As someone who uses the channeling method very frequently for personal guidance, I have quickly learned that STS types will take every, and I mean every opportunity to insert their nonsense into ongoing communication, often successfully imitating the "voice" of the STO entity one is communicating with. They can also be very subtle in their efforts, so that the deception/misdirection is not immediately obvious.
I've learned that mentally requesting the entity I'm speaking with to add "that is the truth" to the end of every (or nearly every) sentence weeds out 99% of this type of nonsense. There is a cost to them of making that statement, which was described to me as a karmic one, and they are unwilling to take that "hit" the vast majority of the time - but they do it when the potential payoff for them is high enough.
Even Carla, despite amazing purity and skills, was not immune to this - I recall reading a channeled message from Quo where Scientology was randomly referred to in a neutral-to-positive way, for example, a completely unnecessary and glaring "false note" in the message which made it clear what had happened.
The point is, with your messages being intended for a mass audience, it becomes absolutely vital to ensure the integrity of the message.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)