Intelligent Infinity, has no polarization

[unity100]

This concept is incorrect as is any concept of the one intelligent infinity. This concept is correct in the context of one particular Logos, or Love, or focus of this Creator which has chosen Its, shall we say, natural laws and ways of expressing them mathematically and otherwise.

The one undifferentiated intelligent infinity, unpolarized, full and whole, is the macrocosm of the mystery-clad being. We are messengers of the Law of One. Unity, at this approximation of understanding, cannot be specified by any physics but only become activated or potentiated intelligent infinity due to the catalyst of free will. This may be difficult to accept. However, the understandings we have to share begin and end in mystery.

Though this may sound cliched, it appears that any attempt to conceptualise intelligent infinity is rendered futile by the finiteness of our understanding. Faith, it appears, is the key to unlocking the experience of intelligent infinity. Please consider the following quote from Ra (session 3) -

finiteness of our understanding doesnt make what we have actually uncovered irrelevant or baseless. what we know, is what we know. there are things which can be concluded with what we understand.

if not, then all the conceptualizations of Law of One, everything being one and so on, would be all balooney talk, and Ra material would be dud and null, because 'any attempt to conceptualize intelligent infinity would be rendered futile with our understanding'.

however, it is not as such. ra is teaching oneness, unifiedness of existence, through the very deduction that they make from the infinity themselves, leave aside any conceptualization of intelligent infinity ; each manifesting entity, anything existent, are results of the same infinite source, therefore, all one in source. all are based on the conceptualization of intelligent infinity, and infinity.

being able to manifest something with full understanding is different from rationalizing something.

It appears as if Ra is calling the path of faith as 'the infinite path'. The path of 'proving/understanding' (or conceptualizing through measure and pen) is finite, apart from being arduous. And it can at best probably offer a correct understanding only within a particular context (please see the Ra quote taken from session 28). Intelligent infinity in its fullness is probably only accessible on the 'infinite path' (or the road of faith), as only infinity can fathom infinity. I bow in awed reverence before the mystery of the One Infinite Creator as I wrestle with the mystical shadows with only a simple and yet an infinite spiritual instrument called faith.

Salutations to the ONE in you.

that logic would make everything we talk here balooney, because, all are results and consequences of infinity itself. as i said, the very 'Law of One' is such a conclusion. 'because there is one, everything is one'. that means, because we cannot fathom infinity in full, and therefore cannot understand it, ra's (which is another finite entity itself) understanding of the infinity is also wrong, therefore, Law of One, which is a deduction of this understanding, also wrong. because, ra wont also be able to fully comprehend infinity, until they become infinite themselves. or, only infinity can fathom infinity. what you say 'salutations to the one in you' would also be fundamentally wrong, because, you can never know whether there is one in me, or not, because you cannot fully comprehend infinity, therefore, know it. you cant know whether there is infinity, or there is 'one'.

however, it is not as such. you are talking about 'one'. therefore, it means, you are making conclusions from the results of a conceptualization of yours, of Ra's, of anything else's. you are saying that all there is is, 'one'. if we take what you say, what you say would be fundamentally wrong, because 'only infinity can fathom infinity, and our attempts would fall short'.

being able to fathom in full, and understanding the core concepts and results of something are totally different.

infinity, is infinity. it needs to be everything that exist, and exists not. this doesnt require being infinite to understand. manifestation of this knowledge, and understanding of all its corollaries, are what require being infinite.