Well, just commenting, if you look at what she actually said it implied that she challenged the person, and the previous example she used was the actual person (A nine year old boy who screamed when he was challenged three times. I think that is probably fine, I'm not sure.). I would gather from the tone of voice that the she did not believe the PERSON she was challenging to be Ra. Of course, people can, and often do become more polite after the fact. But when she said it that was what she seemed to say.
This is strange, far as I can tell David doesn't ask about these topics, his source gives them.
It seems to me this query, if it can't be solved becomes unpolarised. And negative would have been if it was properly used for disharmonious reasons, and there were no harmony coming from it. Or if it were forcibly supressed. These things are meant to be able to be solved but I can't see how we can solve this one. We first need a response. Probably it will basically remain unpolarised, if it can't be used in service to others.
This is strange, far as I can tell David doesn't ask about these topics, his source gives them.
It seems to me this query, if it can't be solved becomes unpolarised. And negative would have been if it was properly used for disharmonious reasons, and there were no harmony coming from it. Or if it were forcibly supressed. These things are meant to be able to be solved but I can't see how we can solve this one. We first need a response. Probably it will basically remain unpolarised, if it can't be used in service to others.