David Wilcock and Carla Rueckert.

[Ankh]

Let's just glaze over the fact there's a strong possibility that one of them challenged the other's entity and in that contest, both can't be right. Unless there is a good reason, such as free will or higher positive sanctioned untruths, which we also won't think about.

Do you mean that Carla challenged DW in some sort of way before channeling him, and recognized him not being of Ra? If this is not what you meant, could you be more precise about what you mean? If this is indeed what you meant, than it must be some sort of misunderstanding, cause Carla challenges only disincarnate beings before she channels them. If these beings do not pass her challenge, which is in the name of Jesus Christ if I remember it correctly, then they go away. There has probably been couple of these disincarnate beings who pretended to be Ra after that contact, but if they didn't pass through her challenges then it was not Ra, and not of positive polarity at all.

This challenge that Carla does, does of course not work on incarnate beings, as we can still lie no matter what the other person believes in. And overall, why "channel" an incarnate being, when one can simply quote them if one wants...? I think that I am rather confused about what you mean actually?