Firstly, just saying. That my heart chakra has major opened up in these last few moments because I have gone back and realised my original writing of 'the priest' was originally a very good one. (I write music). This may have disturbed my channel. The original song was probably more in the direction of love which had kind of been squelched a bit when I threw it away, and love of the negative polarity also. But this is all a work in progress.
If there are David channelings in the Llresearch archives then that does throw suspicion on that assumption I made. This is the exact words, David isn't identified but it seemed likely to me:
31min: Yeah there was just two, the other one was when someone wanted me to think that they were Ra, and I challenged, and they said yeah but I didn't believe them, my gatekeeper said do it again, and I only had to do that one twice. They couldn't resist past the first repetition.
She has a certain southern charm Carla. If it is me that made an assumption here, then it will prove that my reluctance to communicate properly, due to a kind of attachment to and at other time avoidance of spontaneity, is really not been helpful.
So David Wilcock, the (claimed) reincarnation of Ra- ta the priest, is someone who immediately comes to mind there.
This has come up. I'm not though going over llresearch's ideas with a critical eye. This came up because this specific thing was difficult for me with my afformentioned idea as David as extremely positive. In the now the last one as a whole was a good episode, and I have experienced a bit of what I consider to be 'negative' contact that came up to me again and again when I was trying to call Jesus in defence until those defences came down. Now I understand it was the fearful instinct of 'protection' rather than 'love' that got in the way there is a release from fear or at least some healing and direction.
And some others on this forum probably don't believe I have genuinely had negative contact but probably think I'm delusional. To which I answer a) that's not really my concern and b) the Edgar Cayce readings said that mental illnesses were often due to negatives anyway so these distinctions are one and the same.
If there are David channelings in the Llresearch archives then that does throw suspicion on that assumption I made. This is the exact words, David isn't identified but it seemed likely to me:
31min: Yeah there was just two, the other one was when someone wanted me to think that they were Ra, and I challenged, and they said yeah but I didn't believe them, my gatekeeper said do it again, and I only had to do that one twice. They couldn't resist past the first repetition.
She has a certain southern charm Carla. If it is me that made an assumption here, then it will prove that my reluctance to communicate properly, due to a kind of attachment to and at other time avoidance of spontaneity, is really not been helpful.
So David Wilcock, the (claimed) reincarnation of Ra- ta the priest, is someone who immediately comes to mind there.
This has come up. I'm not though going over llresearch's ideas with a critical eye. This came up because this specific thing was difficult for me with my afformentioned idea as David as extremely positive. In the now the last one as a whole was a good episode, and I have experienced a bit of what I consider to be 'negative' contact that came up to me again and again when I was trying to call Jesus in defence until those defences came down. Now I understand it was the fearful instinct of 'protection' rather than 'love' that got in the way there is a release from fear or at least some healing and direction.
And some others on this forum probably don't believe I have genuinely had negative contact but probably think I'm delusional. To which I answer a) that's not really my concern and b) the Edgar Cayce readings said that mental illnesses were often due to negatives anyway so these distinctions are one and the same.