Intelligent Infinity, has no polarization

[Monica]

But that it is therefore not infinite isn't true, infinity can still be limited.

It can be infinite within a finite structure.

But you're basically calling a cat a dog. We should not redefine words when the correct words like in this case totality are readily available.

We are using the words Ra used.

Nassim Haramein knows the correct words. He uses the term infinity correctly. Nassim Haramein is demonstrating my point. His infinity within limits IS the same as infinity This is a correct use of the word. Why would Haramein not know his stuff?

Nassim does know his stuff. He is explaining infinity within finite structures, so he is using the term correctly and in alignment with mathematics/physics...and has no conflict with the Law of One in the context he is using.

When he says the infinitely small he uses the word infinite. Why would that be? Because it isn't really infinity? Or because it IS really infinity?

The key here is the use of a qualifier. He didn't just say infinite. He said infinitely small. Thus, infinite becomes an adjective, a descriptor, a qualifier. Not the same as the term infinity by itself.