07-16-2010, 12:18 PM
(07-16-2010, 12:11 PM)Phoenix Wrote: I also have a problem with this 'perfect' problem. If it has been clearly stated that in third density we cannot understand (16.37). I don't see the value of arbitrarily changing Ra's words because you don't agree with them.
if this is related to the matter of infinity, there is nothing about not to understand in 3d. infinity is infinity. you just cannot manifest it.
if this is related to infringement of the likes GLB talks about, then, it is again irrelevant - because the types of infringement like in adept's work is not only a potential for a 6d wanderer in 3d, but also a 3d entity doing adept work in 3d. remember that these teachings were given to 3d entities when they were first given. so, they are understandable and usable by them, even if a bit harder than an 6d entity would be able to.