Intelligent Infinity, has no polarization

[unity100]

Intelligent Infinity was the Infinite One, and its first expression of itself being the "word" which literally means Love/Logos; this would mean that the only way to express itself at first is love, because, it is not another essence but love.

that is erroneous in regard to what Ra says. ra says the first thing there was infinity, second was infinity becoming consciousness. this conscious infinity is intelligent infinity.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session_id=13&ss=1#7

there is no 'word' or 'love' here. there is awareness.

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session_id=15&ss=1#21

15.21 Questioner: In yesterday’s material you mentioned that the first distortion was the distortion of free will. Is there a sequence, a first, second, and third distortion of the Law of One?

Ra: I am Ra. Only up to a very short point. After this point, the many-ness of distortions are equal one to another. The first distortion, free will, finds focus. This is the second distortion known to you as Logos, the Creative Principle or Love. This intelligent energy thus creates a distortion known as Light. From these three distortions come many, many hierarchies of distortions, each having its own paradoxes to be synthesized, no one being more important than another.

that means intelligent infinity is there, it realizes the first distortion that is free will, then this, finding a focus, leads to second distortion, creative principle, or love. this is what Ra says. the intelligent energy becomes at this point. then, this creates another distortion, the third, light.

if you go to first expressions or how it can express itself or similar, the first way, first distortion that intelligent infinity expresses itself becomes free will. if you push it so far as to try to define infinity with its first expression, it therefore becomes, free will. love, is what comes into being after that point, and as a result of this.

So you can say that Intelligent Infinity is not love, but logically that would mean that it's first expression would be pure nothingness - if that is what your trying to say; however, this not the case.

its first expression is free will.

pure nothingness, is infinity. it is 3 principles above love, 2 principles above free will, 1 principle above intelligent infinity.

Due One Infinite Creators great Original Thought (of love/the logos) the Creator will always be love because there is no time so in a confusing-paradoxic way, there is no beginning or end to the One Infinite Creator being love and or the great heart beat of the One Infinite Creator - each beat saying "love", "love", "love". So, this argument holds no reasoning as there is no end to the One Infinite Creators, infinite essence, of love.

according to what Ra says, the 'original thought' is free will, as in the above.

---

I understand what you're saying and you're right, generally speaking this is true, but according to the notion that all is one, or the holographic nature of the cosmos. We can assume that every individual present here IS in fact the whole universe. It is a matter of where you put your identification I think.

a microcosm being infinite in itself, inside, does not mean it can encompass entirety of infinity outside.

if, it was possible, negative path wouldnt have to turn at the early stages of 6d to positive, because they would be able to transplant themselves, a microcosm, as the entire infinity inside and outside themselves.

but, because they can not, they have to merge with entire infinity themselves.

intelligent infinity exists before love even comes into being.

Do you think intelligent infinity is bound to time?

before/after in this context are not relevant to time. take them as priority if you will, take them as cause-effect if you will, take them as being higher principles if you will.