07-13-2010, 09:02 PM
(07-13-2010, 11:05 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote:(07-12-2010, 11:09 PM)Bring4th_GLB Wrote: As to infringing, I know that you, like me, unlike Ra, are just a bozo on this bus. I am therefore more free to accept, reject, or ignore your interpretation.
Ra is also just a bozo on the bus, or as they put it, "an humble messenger of the Law of One."
If I explain it to you, and you accept my explanation, then my actions will have caused a change in you. That's not infringement, but is a responsibility, one that I ought to consider before undertaking. I think that's the essence of the paragraph that I said reminded me of unity100: try to put yourself in the shoes of the one you're intending to serve and see if the service you are considering is appropriate.
Hey βαθμιαίος,
Well then as long as you don't claim authorship for the circumstance of my head exploding when you reveal the true meaning of that excerpt to me, then I think you need not be concerned about infringing on my free will.

(Referring to this nugget for the humor: 73.14 "Infringement upon free will occurs in this circumstance only if the entity doing the working ascribes the authorship of this event to its self or its own skills." In other words, had Jesus, say, claimed authorship over his miracles he would have been infringing on free will.)
: ) GLB
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi