Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?

    Thread: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another?


    unity100 (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 4,502
    Threads: 152
    Joined: May 2010
    #36
    07-13-2010, 03:51 PM
    (07-13-2010, 03:23 PM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Maybe, but it can also be done with intuition.

    the mechanisms of the concept called intuition wouldnt be any different from the base concepts that make all the creation work in the physical. ra says that intelligent energy designed the octave with discrete increments of densities/rays each of which carrying the properties of a certain aspect of infinity. with this logic, it doesnt matter if it is time/space, or space/time, communication would still be relevant to blue ray, and the metaphysical properties behind it, even if for intuition.

    Quote:By the way, Ra uses understanding synonymously with fourth density ("the vibration or density of love or understanding").

    understanding of the other self, its emotions, its desires, pains.

    understanding in the context i used, is understanding the dance of life, ie, 5d work.

    Quote:It was Ra that used the term delicate, in advice given for third-density conditions.

    natural - if you remember it was noted that Ra material was intended for the advanced seeker. also the fact that majority of wanderers are from 6d. those wanderers, should, as a responsibility, attempt to function with the highest consciousness they can. optimally this would be 6, and hence the relevant advice.

    Quote:Hmm. Free will still applies in and to fourth density. Fourth-density entities may want to solve everyone's problems for them, but they will surely lose polarity if they do so. They are trying to learn wisdom: "the vibration love being that density in which those who have learned to do an activity called “loving” without significant distortion, then seek the ways of light or wisdom."

    http://lawofone.info/results.php?session_id=43&ss=1#29

    firstly, apparently the conditions for experience and learning in 3d and 4d are not the same, as in the above link.

    second, the work of 4d is not quite about wisdom - its about harmonizing with the societal complex, through acceptance and understanding of others' thoughts and emotions, ie other selves, as in the below link :

    http://lawofone.info/results.php?session_id=48&ss=1#5


    interpretation of free will in your approach is not quite right - polarity would be lost for a 4d entity IN 3d incarnation, only if it was infringing on another's free will for its own benefit.

    free will in the infringement sense, is a concept related to the veil and its consequences, as you can understand from the relevant cases in Ra, especially about Ra itself.

    if, the 4d entity, despite being in 4d, went past the veil through 'unnatural means' and offered service to a 3d entity without its calling, that would be an infringement.

    however, if the 4d entity is incarnated, or, in the case of a negative or positive entity, somehow passed the quarantine through any means, then they are free to offer their service.

    especially for a 4d entity in 3d incarnation, the veil and quarantine issues are irrelevant. the entity is already incarnated through normal means. therefore, any kind of offering of extreme love and sacrifice would not be an infringement of anyone's free will. since the entity is offering its help without any condition, return, expectancy, desire to control, and in full acceptance and forgiveness of itself and the other, it is even questionable that there could be any karma.

    what however, would possibly be, would be a screw up in regard to wisdom, creating consequences that somehow would need to be fixed. however, this is not an infringement.

    you can call it infringement only if you look at it in the same manner i mentioned in earlier pages of this thread in my posts ; creating a spiritual momentum, entanglement, an intertwining of fates.

    however since all acts create consequences and end in such results, it becomes only a matter of choosing what particular momentum/fate thread you want to choose, and which responsibility/weight to shoulder.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-05-2010, 09:36 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by JoshC - 07-06-2010, 02:12 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 03:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:47 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-06-2010, 01:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-06-2010, 02:20 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-06-2010, 07:57 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Aaron - 07-07-2010, 10:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 06:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 12:15 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 06:31 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-08-2010, 06:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-08-2010, 08:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-08-2010, 11:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 07:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:08 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-12-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 11:09 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 11:10 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 12:49 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-13-2010, 09:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 12:35 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 11:20 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-09-2010, 09:28 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-10-2010, 11:05 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-12-2010, 09:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 12:36 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 05:42 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-09-2010, 09:43 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 01:15 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 01:41 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 03:23 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 03:51 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 05:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 05:45 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 06:35 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 06:43 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by βαθμιαίος - 07-13-2010, 07:06 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-13-2010, 09:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Phoenix - 07-16-2010, 12:11 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-16-2010, 12:18 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-14-2010, 10:48 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Steppingfeet - 07-15-2010, 01:33 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 02:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 03:58 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 04:42 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 04:07 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-15-2010, 05:04 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 05:10 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 05:13 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-15-2010, 06:16 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by unity100 - 07-15-2010, 08:02 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Monica - 07-15-2010, 11:54 PM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Namaste - 07-16-2010, 05:52 AM
    RE: Can the human infringe by doing the learning for another? - by Richard - 07-16-2010, 11:07 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode