Do you guys actually believe this stuff?

[JustLikeYou]

JLY I was using consensus definitions rather than making up my own, as you have taken the liberty of doing.

If I don't hold a consensus perspective, why would I use consensus defintions? I think that mainstream thought systems are poor models, resulting in unnecessary equivocation and vagueness, especially where non-physical description is concerned.

Further, the idea of an objective description of reality, while useful, has no direct bearing on human experience. So I have had to redefine all epistemological terms in order to excise claims to absolute objectivity. We little folk down here just don't get that luxury.

Like I said before assuming that all different explanations and models of reality hold the same degree of accuracy and therefore it is simply a matter of choosing one like a pair of clothes is ridiculous.

I've never said this.

A framework that makes extraordinary claims, to utilize this framework you have to use these claims when interpreting information and experience.

And I do. That's the whole freakin point. What good is a philosophy (or a framework) if you don't use it?

---

To argue that your ad hoc cosmic explanations for Ra's concept of polarity is as justified for being made up as a scientific theory that yields results in relation to observable phenomena is just too much.

All good theories have to begin somewhere.