(09-06-2014, 11:22 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Wait, wait... So suddenly the first estimate on Google based on the latest bleeding edge interpretation of planetary radiation, which could be very fallible, is a large contender of information here?
Especially when we believe in undiscovered metaphysical systems presented by Ra?
http://science.howstuffworks.com/milky-way5.htm
I don't see how metaphysical systems would change the number of planets in the galaxy. I honestly do not know. Come to think of it, I don't really know anything. Yippee.
There's also this:
Quote:7.4 Questioner: [Inaudible] use an example. If ten, only ten, entities on earth required your services how would you compute their call using this square rule?
Ra: We would square one ten sequential times, raising the number to the tenth square.
7.5 Questioner: What would be the result of this calculation?
Ra: [24-second pause] The result is difficult to transmit. It is one thousand and twelve [1,012], approximately. The entities who call are sometimes not totally unified in their calling and, thus, the squaring is slightly less. Thus, there is a statistical loss over a period of call. However, perhaps you may see by this statistically corrected information the squaring mechanism.
Ra has a difficult time transmitting this calculation, yet they are able to give other much larger and seemingly more difficult calculations without such a pause. Not looking good for Ra at all. Haha. These are just some of the inconsistencies I've picked up on. Good day folks.