Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Science & Technology Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"

    Thread: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural"


    Cyclops (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 214
    Threads: 5
    Joined: Jan 2010
    #11
    07-06-2010, 11:39 PM (This post was last modified: 07-06-2010, 11:44 PM by Cyclops.)
    (07-06-2010, 10:23 PM)Lavazza Wrote:
    Quote:Ra: I am Ra. If you can understand the concept of thought-forms you will realize that the thought-form is more regular in its distortion than the energy fields created by the materials in the rock which has been created through thought form from thought to finite energy and being-ness in your, shall we say, distorted reflection of the level of the thought-form.

    Here we see an example from the Ra Material which is extremely cryptic in nature. I've read it a few times now and not cracked the code. Anyone? Huh Huh Huh All I can make out is that Ra is saying the result of the thought form (everlasting stone?) is more stable than the energy used to create it? Doesn't seem to explain much, maybe Ra pulled a cosmic dodge on that question? Wink

    This is a good question, trying to think about it made me pretty confused but I can attempt an assumption of an answer. They said they used everlasting rock and they also said that creation is hierarchical. Take a look at this excerpt first.

    Quote:Ra: I am Ra. You must picture the activity within all that is created. The energy is, though finite, quite large compared to the understanding/distortion by your peoples. This is an obvious point well known to your people, but little considered.

    This energy is intelligent. It is hierarchical. Much as your mind/body/spirit complex dwells within a hierarchy of vehicles and retains, therefore, the shell or shape or field, and the intelligence of each ascendingly intelligent or balanced body, so does each atom of such a material as rock. When one can speak to that intelligence, the finite energy of the physical, or chemical rock/body is put into contact with that infinite power which is resident in the more well-tuned bodies, be they human or rock.

    With this connection made, a request may be given. The intelligence of infinite rock-ness communicates to its physical vehicle and that splitting and moving which is desired is then carried out through the displacement of the energy field of rock-ness from finity to a dimension which we may conveniently call, simply, infinity.

    In this way, that which is required is accomplished due to a cooperation of the infinite understanding of the Creator indwelling in the living rock. This is, of course, the mechanism by which many things are accomplished, which are not subject to your present means of physical analysis of action at a distance.

    So its a guess based on the excerpts I read which sums that it works kind of like this: rockness or rock has an infinite number of shapes/forms/vehicles/fields. All of these vehicles have a hierarchy which is increasingly intelligent going further and further up. Ra used thought to communicate with a higher up or more intelligent/balanced or how they said "Regular" vehicle of rock. So as they say in the excerpt above it can be thought to contact a higher intelligent or more well-tuned form or vehicle of rock which communicated to its lower self form that was already there, to transform.

    The way they described it filled me with wonder because if I see it a little correctly the entire creator is there even in the smallest of particles which if realized can be tapped into by the creator (Ra in this case). The request given from creator to the creator in the rock to assume a higher form "everlasting rock" by connecting the originally made rock to its infinite potential, just as in the excerpt above where they used to split it and move it as well. This is entirely an assumption which may be an incorrect interpretation of Ra's answer but I felt I'd give it a shot.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 11:27 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:39 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 12:06 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 01:09 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 01:21 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 02:58 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-06-2010, 04:32 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-06-2010, 05:08 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Ali Quadir - 07-06-2010, 05:43 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-06-2010, 10:23 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Cyclops - 07-06-2010, 11:39 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-06-2010, 11:59 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:36 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by AnthroHeart - 07-07-2010, 10:14 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 05:20 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 07:03 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 06:48 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Lavazza - 07-07-2010, 11:43 AM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-07-2010, 01:01 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Monica - 07-07-2010, 09:04 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Pablísimo - 07-09-2010, 05:47 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by LsavedSmeD - 07-07-2010, 01:54 PM
    RE: Proof: The Great Pyramid's stones are "not natural" - by Namaste - 07-07-2010, 08:39 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode