03-06-2009, 03:45 PM
I think it bears considering that when Ra spoke of what we would call our future, that he spoke in terms of probability and possibility (i.e. anything possible, not necessarily probable). Also, consider that time and space (i.e. our experience) is considered an illusion. For anything to be possible, it means that our choices affect what we experience in our future. For the probability of something to be estimable, it would seem that Ra would use past choices as prologue for calculation. So it would seem that Ra's ability to predict our future is similar to our trying to predict the weather. The further out (i.e. more orders of magnitude of possibilities due to the number of entities making choices) you get, the more ambiguous the result.
I also find it interesting that 'densities' are also referred to as 'vibrations', which seem to correspond to space and time, and the difference between light as a mass or a wave. Are we (humans) the focal vectors through which light (wave -- time) manifest (space) after being filtered by belief / choice (individual and collective)?
It seems like in trying to understand t/s and s/t, we are really trying to understand the nature of the illusion / veil, to see the man behind the curtain as it were.
I also find it interesting that 'densities' are also referred to as 'vibrations', which seem to correspond to space and time, and the difference between light as a mass or a wave. Are we (humans) the focal vectors through which light (wave -- time) manifest (space) after being filtered by belief / choice (individual and collective)?
It seems like in trying to understand t/s and s/t, we are really trying to understand the nature of the illusion / veil, to see the man behind the curtain as it were.