Random Ra Material Questions

[andreazzi]

It is interesting to note that Ra opted not to call a "planet" those spheres "locked" 1st density, meaning that for whatever reason they are not viable for spiritual evolution. The interesting point, however, is that they are yet in 1st density.

You just hit the point! What makes this sphere first density then?

Addendum:

In the above quotes, Ra indicates 1/5th (20%) of all planetary spheres of this Logos/Galaxy contain awareness of one or more densities, and yet later they say the percentage of inhabited planets is 10% (or 1/10th). So are the remaining "uninhabited" planets (i.e. not "containing" awareness) not 1st-density spheres?

Yes, you are correct pointing this out, and I really think this discrepancy is due to Ra's difficulty with numbers:

If "one-fifth of all planetary entities contain awareness of one or more densities" and there are "67,000,000 planets with aware life regardless of density" then it would be correct to assume that there are 335,000,000 planets in the galaxy, and this we know is not correct. Then there must be an error in these numbering translations.

Is "containing awareness" the same as being "inhabited"?

I would interpret "containing awareness" as refering to planets in any density (1st-7th), and "inhabited" as those planets on which inhabitants or living organisms dwell (2nd-7th density).

A real banquet for the mind.