Random Ra Material Questions

[Siren]

Actually, that was my confusion. I was thinking first density as every planet without "aware life" and when Ra says that there are some first density planets with "aware life", in the question 16.27, my confusion emerged.

Now I do understand all the densities as having "aware life", but from that point of view, what is the difference between a first density planet and a rocky "dead" planet? What triggers the concept of first density life, or elemental awareness, since there are no biological organisms evolved in this density?

The first question, really, is "what is a planet?" Whilst some people would regard the planet as its 1st density materials (rocks, mountains, oceans, valleys, clouds, sky, etc—in short, the water they drink, air they breathe and earth they stand on), others would include 2nd-density plants as being "the planet"—distinguishing higher 2nd-density animals and 3rd-density humans as being not "the planet."

It is my distortion/understanding that a planetary sphere is, first and foremost, a focus, vortex or web of geometrically-interlocking fields of spiraling electromagnetic energy (i.e. nothing physical whatsoever) which only as it phases into 1st-density activation begins to slowly coalesce, coagulate or compact into that familiar globular shape of molecular/chemical elements everyone regards as a "planet."

The difference between a planetary sphere and a sun or star seems to be that the former has the potential to offer an experience of spiritual progression through 7 succeeding densities of awareness, whilst the former does not but rather "dwells spiritually as portion of Logos/Creator."

Some pertaining quotes:

71.10 Approximately 32% of stars have planets as you know them while another 6% have some sort of clustering material which upon some densities might be inhabitable.

16.25 Approximately one-fifth of all planetary entities contain awareness of one or more densities.

71.9 These processes occur upon all planets which have given birth to sub-Logoi such as yourselves. The percentage of inhabited planets is approximately 10%.

29.32 In this way there is much of your galactic system which does not have the progression of which you speak but dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos.

11.41 There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature, but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density.

It is interesting to note that Ra opted not to call a "planet" those spheres "locked" 1st density, meaning that for whatever reason they are not viable for spiritual evolution. The interesting point, however, is that they are yet in 1st density.

It might also be interesting to point out that the beingness of 1st density awareness is purely elemental or molecular/chemical, and that stars are "manufacturing" many of these very 1st-density atomic elements (from hydrogen and helium all the way to "heavier" elements like iron and oxygen), yet the sun is not a 1st-density planet.

This may suggest something regarding the notion of "dwelling spiritually."

---

Addendum:

In the above quotes, Ra indicates 1/5th (20%) of all planetary spheres of this Logos/Galaxy contain awareness of one or more densities, and yet later they say the percentage of inhabited planets is 10% (or 1/10th). So are the remaining "uninhabited" planets (i.e. not "containing" awareness) not 1st-density spheres?

Is "containing awareness" the same as being "inhabited"? What accounts for this discrepancy? Or is it all just semantics?

Food for thought.