08-08-2014, 07:35 AM
(08-08-2014, 01:43 AM)Learner Wrote: I have a totally different understanding of the text you quoted. To me it does not indicate any planet could be "dead" (i.e. without any density). Let me explain:
29.32
The particular Logos of your major galaxy has used a large portion of Its coalesced material to reflect the beingness of the Creator.
In this sentence Ra explained that in our Logos objects made of matters (coalesced material) is where the consciousness reside (i.e. used "to reflect the beingness of the Creator".
In this way there is much of your galactic system which does not have the progression of which you speak but dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos.
You probably know, much of the universe as we know contains mostly space, star systems and planets are only very small portion of the vast space that contains the galactic system. The space that does not contain matter, e.g. vacuum, is not nothing -- this is what current mainstream science has not understood. It is filled with energy, or aether as called by the ancient scientists. Ra was saying that this emptiness that is also part of the Logos that our spirit can reside, but it does not have consciousness reside on it for evolution.
Yes, we indeed have different understandings of the text. But you must know that the Milky Way contains at least 100 billion planets, and this is a minimum, so, the 67,000,000 planets Ra mentions as having "aware life" are not the total planets in the galaxy, and thus the other planetary spheres are not part of the densities at least at this moment.
Anyway, this is a matter of interpretation and assumption as "Ra does not address this specific question" quoting our friend, Gary.
Feel free to draw your own conclusions!
